These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34921115)

  • 1. Why ex post peer review encourages high-risk research while ex ante review discourages it.
    Gross K; Bergstrom CT
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Dec; 118(51):. PubMed ID: 34921115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From Metaphors to Formalism: A Heuristic Approach to Holistic Assessments of Ecosystem Health.
    Fock HO; Kraus G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0159481. PubMed ID: 27509185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing the quality risk of elderly care services in government procurement from market-oriented private providers through ex ante policy design: lessons from the principal-agent theory analysis.
    Song H; Yu S; Sun T
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Dec; 20(1):1135. PubMed ID: 33302941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Financing long-term care: ex ante, ex post or both?
    Costa-Font J; Courbage C; Swartz K
    Health Econ; 2015 Mar; 24 Suppl 1():45-57. PubMed ID: 25760582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'CoI consultancy'.
    Charlton BG
    Med Hypotheses; 2004; 63(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15236772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impacts of intellectual property provisions in trade treaties on access to medicine in low and middle income countries: a systematic review.
    Islam MD; Kaplan WA; Trachtenberg D; Thrasher R; Gallagher KP; Wirtz VJ
    Global Health; 2019 Dec; 15(1):88. PubMed ID: 31888688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Willingness to pay for rapid diagnostic tests for the diagnosis and treatment of malaria in southeast Nigeria: ex post and ex ante.
    Uzochukwu BS; Onwujekwe OE; Uguru NP; Ughasoro MD; Ezeoke OP
    Int J Equity Health; 2010 Jan; 9():1. PubMed ID: 20148118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review.
    Park IU; Peacey MW; Munafò MR
    Nature; 2014 Feb; 506(7486):93-6. PubMed ID: 24305052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Socioeconomic impact assessment in ex ante evaluations: a case study on the rural development programs of the European Union.
    Vidueira P; Díaz-Puente JM; Rivera M
    Eval Rev; 2014 Aug; 38(4):309-35. PubMed ID: 25225277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ex post and ex ante willingness to pay (WTP) for the ICT Malaria Pf/Pv test kit in Myanmar.
    Cho-Min-Naing ; Lertmaharit S; Kamol-Ratanakul P; Saul AJ
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2000 Mar; 31(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 11023075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving Evaluation of Energy Policies with Multiple Goals: Comparing Ex Ante and Ex Post Approaches.
    Qiu M; Weng Y; Cao J; Selin NE; Karplus VJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Dec; 54(24):15584-15593. PubMed ID: 33263386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions.
    Gross K; Bergstrom CT
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Jan; 17(1):e3000065. PubMed ID: 30601806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Open evaluation: a vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer review and rating for science.
    Kriegeskorte N
    Front Comput Neurosci; 2012; 6():79. PubMed ID: 23087639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Science peer review for the 21st century: Assessing scientific consensus for decision-making while managing conflict of interests, reviewer and process bias.
    Kirman CR; Simon TW; Hays SM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Apr; 103():73-85. PubMed ID: 30634024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science.
    Subotnik RF; Olszewski-Kubilius P; Worrell FC
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2011 Jan; 12(1):3-54. PubMed ID: 26168418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Editorial Peer Reviewers as Shepherds, Rather Than Gatekeepers.
    Boerckel JD; Plotkin LI; Sims NA
    J Bone Miner Res; 2021 Jul; 36(7):1220-1224. PubMed ID: 33900654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The miracle of peer review and development in science: an agent-based model.
    Righi S; Takács K
    Scientometrics; 2017; 113(1):587-607. PubMed ID: 29056792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Willingness to pay for QALY: perspectives and contexts in Japan.
    Igarashi A; Goto R; Yoneyama-Hirozane M
    J Med Econ; 2019 Oct; 22(10):1041-1046. PubMed ID: 31262236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.
    Kelly J; Sadeghieh T; Adeli K
    EJIFCC; 2014 Oct; 25(3):227-43. PubMed ID: 27683470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.