These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34921179)
1. Great tits feed their nestlings with more but smaller prey items and fewer caterpillars in cities than in forests. Sinkovics C; Seress G; Pipoly I; Vincze E; Liker A Sci Rep; 2021 Dec; 11(1):24161. PubMed ID: 34921179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Food availability limits avian reproduction in the city: An experimental study on great tits Parus major. Seress G; Sándor K; Evans KL; Liker A J Anim Ecol; 2020 Jul; 89(7):1570-1580. PubMed ID: 32419138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The importance of a main dish: nestling diet and foraging behaviour in Mediterranean blue tits in relation to prey phenology. García-Navas V; Sanz JJ Oecologia; 2011 Mar; 165(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 21113622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of urbanization on abundance and phenology of caterpillars and consequences for breeding in an insectivorous bird. Seress G; Hammer T; Bókony V; Vincze E; Preiszner B; Pipoly I; Sinkovics C; Evans KL; Liker A Ecol Appl; 2018 Jul; 28(5):1143-1156. PubMed ID: 29679462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Integrated behavioural and stable isotope data reveal altered diet linked to low breeding success in urban-dwelling blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus). Pollock CJ; Capilla-Lasheras P; McGill RAR; Helm B; Dominoni DM Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):5014. PubMed ID: 28694437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bitter fruits of hard labour: diet metabarcoding and telemetry reveal that urban songbirds travel further for lower-quality food. Jarrett C; Powell LL; McDevitt H; Helm B; Welch AJ Oecologia; 2020 Jun; 193(2):377-388. PubMed ID: 32533359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parental food provisioning is related to nestling stress response in wild great tit nestlings: implications for the development of personality. Oers Kv; Kohn GM; Hinde CA; Naguib M Front Zool; 2015; 12(Suppl 1):S10. PubMed ID: 26913051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of habitat fragmentation on provisioning rates, diet and breeding success in two species of tit (great tit and blue tit). Nour N; Currie D; Matthysen E; Van Damme R; Dhondt AA Oecologia; 1998 May; 114(4):522-530. PubMed ID: 28307901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does offspring sex ratio differ between urban and forest populations of great tits (Parus major)? Ágh N; Pipoly I; Szabó K; Vincze E; Bókony V; Seress G; Liker A Biol Futur; 2020 Jun; 71(1-2):99-108. PubMed ID: 34554536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial and temporal variation in heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratios of nestling passerine birds: comparison of blue tits and great tits. Banbura J; Skwarska J; Banbura M; Gladalski M; Holysz M; Kalinski A; Markowski M; Wawrzyniak J; Zielinski P PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74226. PubMed ID: 24066123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Double-brooding and annual breeding success of great tits in urban and forest habitats. Bukor B; Seress G; Pipoly I; Sándor K; Sinkovics C; Vincze E; Liker A Curr Zool; 2022 Oct; 68(5):517-525. PubMed ID: 36324531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nestling diet variation in an insular Mediterranean population of blue tits Parus caeruleus: effects of years, territories and individuals. Bańbura J; Blondel J; de Wilde-Lambrechts H; Galan MJ; Maistre M Oecologia; 1994 Dec; 100(4):413-420. PubMed ID: 28306930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Disentangling drivers of reproductive performance in urban great tits: a food supplementation experiment. Demeyrier V; Charmantier A; Lambrechts MM; Grégoire A J Exp Biol; 2017 Nov; 220(Pt 22):4195-4203. PubMed ID: 28939562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predatory birds and ants partition caterpillar prey by body size and diet breadth. Singer MS; Clark RE; Lichter-Marck IH; Johnson ER; Mooney KA J Anim Ecol; 2017 Oct; 86(6):1363-1371. PubMed ID: 28686298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Urban versus forest ecotypes are not explained by divergent reproductive selection. Caizergues AE; Grégoire A; Charmantier A Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Jul; 285(1882):. PubMed ID: 30051819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are behaviour and stress-related phenotypes in urban birds adaptive? Caizergues AE; Grégoire A; Choquet R; Perret S; Charmantier A J Anim Ecol; 2022 Aug; 91(8):1627-1641. PubMed ID: 35575101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Problem-solving performance and reproductive success of great tits in urban and forest habitats. Preiszner B; Papp S; Pipoly I; Seress G; Vincze E; Liker A; Bókony V Anim Cogn; 2017 Jan; 20(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 27294267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Urbanisation-associated shifts in the avian metabolome within the annual cycle. Watson H; Nilsson JÅ; Smith E; Ottosson F; Melander O; Hegemann A; Urhan U; Isaksson C Sci Total Environ; 2024 Sep; 944():173624. PubMed ID: 38821291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diet composition and diversity does not explain fewer, smaller urban nestlings. Grabarczyk EE; Gill SA; Vonhof MJ; Alabady MS; Wang Z; Schmidt JM PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0264381. PubMed ID: 35231042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]