These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34921610)

  • 1. Can activated titanium interbody cages accelerate or enhance spinal fusion? a review of the literature and a design for clinical trials.
    Toop N; Gifford C; Motiei-Langroudi R; Farzadi A; Boulter D; Forghani R; Farhadi HF
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2021 Dec; 33(1):1. PubMed ID: 34921610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Promotion of higher rates of early fusion using activated titanium versus polyetheretherketone cages in adults undergoing 1- and 2-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a randomized controlled trial.
    Toop N; Dhaliwal J; Gifford CS; Gibbs D; Keister A; Miracle S; Forghani R; Grossbach AJ; Farhadi HF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Nov; 39(5):709-718. PubMed ID: 37542447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.
    McGilvray KC; Easley J; Seim HB; Regan D; Berven SH; Hsu WK; Mroz TE; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 29496624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison in the same intervertebral space between titanium-coated and uncoated PEEK cages in lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
    Kashii M; Kitaguchi K; Makino T; Kaito T
    J Orthop Sci; 2020 Jul; 25(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 31375363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spine interbody implants: material selection and modification, functionalization and bioactivation of surfaces to improve osseointegration.
    Rao PJ; Pelletier MH; Walsh WR; Mobbs RJ
    Orthop Surg; 2014 May; 6(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 24890288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) titanium composite interbody spacer in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model: biomechanical, microcomputed tomographic, and histologic analyses.
    McGilvray KC; Waldorff EI; Easley J; Seim HB; Zhang N; Linovitz RJ; Ryaby JT; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2017 Dec; 17(12):1907-1916. PubMed ID: 28751242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Titanium (Ti) cages may be superior to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal interbody fusions using Ti versus PEEK cages.
    Tan JH; Cheong CK; Hey HWD
    Eur Spine J; 2021 May; 30(5):1285-1295. PubMed ID: 33555365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: Meta-analysis and review of the literature.
    Seaman S; Kerezoudis P; Bydon M; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 44():23-29. PubMed ID: 28736113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D-printed titanium cages without bone graft outperform PEEK cages with autograft in an animal model.
    Laratta JL; Vivace BJ; López-Peña M; Guzón FM; Gonzalez-Cantalpeidra A; Jorge-Mora A; Villar-Liste RM; Pino-Lopez L; Lukyanchuk A; Taghizadeh EA; Pino-Minguez J
    Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1016-1027. PubMed ID: 34906741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence.
    Campbell PG; Cavanaugh DA; Nunley P; Utter PA; Kerr E; Wadhwa R; Stone M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E10. PubMed ID: 32871573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does impaction of titanium-coated interbody fusion cages into the disc space cause wear debris or delamination?
    Kienle A; Graf N; Wilke HJ
    Spine J; 2016 Feb; 16(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 26409208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation.
    Nemoto O; Asazuma T; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Yasuoka H; Fujikawa A
    Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2150-5. PubMed ID: 25015180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early bone ingrowth and segmental stability of a trussed titanium cage versus a polyether ether ketone cage in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model.
    Loenen ACY; Peters MJM; Bevers RTJ; Schaffrath C; van Haver E; Cuijpers VMJI; Rademakers T; van Rietbergen B; Willems PC; Arts JJ
    Spine J; 2022 Jan; 22(1):174-182. PubMed ID: 34274502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computed tomography color mapping for evaluation of bone ongrowth on the surface of a titanium-coated polyetheretherketone cage in vivo: A pilot study.
    Makino T; Kaito T; Sakai Y; Takenaka S; Yoshikawa H
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(37):e12379. PubMed ID: 30213002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiological and clinical outcomes of novel Ti/PEEK combined spinal fusion cages: a systematic review and preclinical evaluation.
    Assem Y; Mobbs RJ; Pelletier MH; Phan K; Walsh WR
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Mar; 26(3):593-605. PubMed ID: 26671514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Analysis of Radiologic Outcomes Between Polyetheretherketone and Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Cages After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Sultana T; Hossain M; Jeong JH; Im S
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Nov; 179():e241-e255. PubMed ID: 37611804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.
    Deng Z; Zou Q; Wang L; Wang L; Xiu P; Feng G; Song Y; Yang X
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Nov; 15(11):2889-2900. PubMed ID: 37771127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.
    Massaad E; Fatima N; Kiapour A; Hadzipasic M; Shankar GM; Shin JH
    Neurospine; 2020 Mar; 17(1):125-135. PubMed ID: 32252163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Schäfer J; Born C; Duda G; Haas NP; Mittlmeier T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(17):1850-7. PubMed ID: 11568693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study.
    Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.