These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34921842)

  • 1. Improving reproducibility of motor evoked potentials in mice.
    Castoldi V; Rossi E; Marenna S; Comi G; Leocani L
    J Neurosci Methods; 2022 Feb; 367():109444. PubMed ID: 34921842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in Motor Evoked Potentials Induced in Rats by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation under Two Separate Anesthetics: Implications for Plasticity Studies.
    Sykes M; Matheson NA; Brownjohn PW; Tang AD; Rodger J; Shemmell JB; Reynolds JN
    Front Neural Circuits; 2016; 10():80. PubMed ID: 27766073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Longer Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Intertrial Interval Increases Size, Reduces Variability, and Improves the Reliability of Motor Evoked Potentials.
    Hassanzahraee M; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
    Brain Connect; 2019 Dec; 9(10):770-776. PubMed ID: 31744309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation test intensity on the amplitude, variability and reliability of motor evoked potentials.
    Pellegrini M; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
    Brain Res; 2018 Dec; 1700():190-198. PubMed ID: 30194017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of diaphragmatic motor-evoked potentials induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Welch JF; Argento PJ; Mitchell GS; Fox EJ
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2020 Dec; 129(6):1393-1404. PubMed ID: 33031020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.
    Horvath JC; Vogrin SJ; Carter O; Cook MJ; Forte JD
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interindividual variability and age-dependency of motor cortical plasticity induced by paired associative stimulation.
    Müller-Dahlhaus JF; Orekhov Y; Liu Y; Ziemann U
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 May; 187(3):467-75. PubMed ID: 18320180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 25hours.
    Zappasodi F; Musumeci G; Navarra R; Di Lazzaro V; Caulo M; Uncini A
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Apr; 48(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 29248201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of gender, hand dominance, and upper extremity length on motor evoked potentials.
    Livingston SC; Goodkin HP; Ingersoll CD
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2010 Dec; 24(6):427-36. PubMed ID: 21110222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A higher number of TMS-elicited MEP from a combined hotspot improves intra- and inter-session reliability of the upper limb muscles in healthy individuals.
    Bastani A; Jaberzadeh S
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e47582. PubMed ID: 23077645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Rossini-Rothwell and adaptive threshold-hunting methods on the stability of TMS induced motor evoked potentials amplitudes.
    Dissanayaka T; Zoghi M; Farrell M; Egan G; Jaberzadeh S
    J Neurosci Res; 2018 Nov; 96(11):1758-1765. PubMed ID: 30175849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cortico-cortical and motor evoked potentials to single and paired-pulse stimuli: An exploratory transcranial magnetic and intracranial electric brain stimulation study.
    Boulogne S; Andre-Obadia N; Kimiskidis VK; Ryvlin P; Rheims S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Nov; 37(11):3767-3778. PubMed ID: 27312488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differentiation of motor evoked potentials elicited from multiple forearm muscles: An investigation with high-density surface electromyography.
    Neva JL; Gallina A; Peters S; Garland SJ; Boyd LA
    Brain Res; 2017 Dec; 1676():91-99. PubMed ID: 28935187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of intra-operative motor evoked potentials in the optimization of chronic cortical stimulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain.
    Holsheimer J; Lefaucheur JP; Buitenweg JR; Goujon C; Nineb A; Nguyen JP
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 118(10):2287-96. PubMed ID: 17765605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facilitatory conditioning of the supplementary motor area in humans enhances the corticophrenic responsiveness to transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Raux M; Xie H; Similowski T; Koski L
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2010 Jan; 108(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 19892923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modulation of short-latency afferent inhibition and short-interval intracortical inhibition by test stimulus intensity and motor-evoked potential amplitude.
    Miyaguchi S; Kojima S; Sasaki R; Tamaki H; Onishi H
    Neuroreport; 2017 Dec; 28(18):1202-1207. PubMed ID: 29064955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex.
    Wiethoff S; Hamada M; Rothwell JC
    Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(3):468-75. PubMed ID: 24630848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing Motor-Evoked Potential Characteristics of NEedle versus suRFACE Recording Electrodes during Spinal Cord Monitoring-The NERFACE Study Part I.
    Gadella MC; Dulfer SE; Absalom AR; Lange F; Scholtens-Henzen CHM; Groen RJM; Wapstra FH; Faber C; Tamási K; Sahinovic MM; Drost G
    J Clin Med; 2023 Feb; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 36835940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of the neuromuscular blockade levels on amplitudes of posttetanic motor-evoked potentials and movement in response to transcranial stimulation in patients receiving propofol and fentanyl anesthesia.
    Yamamoto Y; Kawaguchi M; Hayashi H; Horiuchi T; Inoue S; Nakase H; Sakaki T; Furuya H
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Mar; 106(3):930-4, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18292442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation does not decrease the variability of motor-evoked potentials.
    Jung NH; Delvendahl I; Kuhnke NG; Hauschke D; Stolle S; Mall V
    Brain Stimul; 2010 Apr; 3(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 20633437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.