BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34923809)

  • 21. Designing and Implementing Deliberative Processes for Health Technology Assessment: A Good Practices Report of a Joint HTAi/ISPOR Task Force.
    Oortwijn W; Husereau D; Abelson J; Barasa E; Bayani DD; Canuto Santos V; Culyer A; Facey K; Grainger D; Kieslich K; Ollendorf D; Pichon-Riviere A; Sandman L; Strammiello V; Teerawattananon Y
    Value Health; 2022 Jun; 25(6):869-886. PubMed ID: 35667778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.
    Levy AR; Mitton C; Johnston KM; Harrigan B; Briggs AH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(10):813-30. PubMed ID: 20831289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Deliberative processes in decision making informed by health technology assessment in Latin America.
    Alcaraz A; Pichon-Riviere A; García-Martí S; Alfie V; Augustovski F; Castro H
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2022 Dec; 38(1):e86. PubMed ID: 36524558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. HTA Agencies Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes Comment on "Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around the Globe".
    Schlander M
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2021 Mar; 10(3):158-161. PubMed ID: 32610783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) for health technology assessment: the Queensland Health experience.
    Howard S; Scott IA; Ju H; McQueen L; Scuffham PA
    Aust Health Rev; 2019 Oct; 43(5):591-599. PubMed ID: 30205873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Insurance Benefit Package Revision in Iran.
    Nouhi M; Baltussen R; Razavi SS; Bijlmakers L; Sahraian MA; Goudarzi Z; Farokhian P; Khedmati J; Jahangiri R; Olyaeemanesh A
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Dec; 11(11):2719-2726. PubMed ID: 35247943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Health technology assessment for sexual reproductive health and rights benefits package design in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review of evidence-informed deliberative processes.
    Simangolwa WM; Mbonigaba J; Govender K
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0306042. PubMed ID: 38935794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Implicit factors influencing the HTA deliberative processes in 5 European countries: results from a mixed-methods research.
    Monleón C; Martin-Späth H; Crespo C; Dussart C; Toumi M
    Health Policy Open; 2023 Dec; 5():100109. PubMed ID: 38073709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy".
    Jansen MP; Helderman JK; Boer B; Baltussen R
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2017 Jan; 6(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 28005541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Principles for deliberative processes in health technology assessment.
    Bond K; Stiffell R; Ollendorf DA
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Aug; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 32746954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Case Studies: Factors Influencing Divergent HTA Reimbursement Recommendations in Australia, Canada, England, and Scotland.
    Allen N; Walker SR; Liberti L; Salek S
    Value Health; 2017 Mar; 20(3):320-328. PubMed ID: 28292476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Health technology assessment for cancer medicines across the G7 countries and Oceania: an international, cross-sectional study.
    Jenei K; Raymakers AJN; Bayle A; Berger-Thürmel K; Cherla A; Honda K; Jackson CCGA; Karikios D; Trapani D; Berry S; Gyawali B
    Lancet Oncol; 2023 Jun; 24(6):624-635. PubMed ID: 37269843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Introducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level.
    Gagnon MP; Lepage-Savary D; Gagnon J; St-Pierre M; Simard C; Rhainds M; Lemieux R; Gauvin FP; Desmartis M; Légaré F
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Mar; 9():54. PubMed ID: 19327160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An International Review of Health Technology Assessment Approaches to Prescription Drugs and Their Ethical Principles.
    Rand LZ; Kesselheim AS
    J Law Med Ethics; 2020 Sep; 48(3):583-594. PubMed ID: 33021189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Health technology assessment and priority setting for universal health coverage: a qualitative study of stakeholders' capacity, needs, policy areas of demand and perspectives in Nigeria.
    Uzochukwu BSC; Okeke C; O'Brien N; Ruiz F; Sombie I; Hollingworth S
    Global Health; 2020 Jul; 16(1):58. PubMed ID: 32641066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Institutionalisation Is a Vital Element for Fairness of Priority Setting in the Package Design if the Target is Universal Health Coverage Comment on "Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefits Package Design - Part II: A Practical Guide".
    Sajadi HS; Jama M; Majdzadeh R
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7544. PubMed ID: 37579458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. PUBLIC AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION.
    Abelson J; Wagner F; DeJean D; Boesveld S; Gauvin FP; Bean S; Axler R; Petersen S; Baidoobonso S; Pron G; Giacomini M; Lavis J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(4):256-264. PubMed ID: 27670693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Systematic literature review on the implicit factors influencing the HTA deliberative process in Europe.
    Monleón C; Späth HM; Crespo C; Dussart C; Toumi M
    J Mark Access Health Policy; 2022; 10(1):2094047. PubMed ID: 35811835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The use of nonrandomized evidence to estimate treatment effects in health technology assessment.
    Kent S; Salcher-Konrad M; Boccia S; Bouvy JC; Waure C; Espin J; Facey K; Nguyen M; Rejon-Parrilla JC; Jonsson P
    J Comp Eff Res; 2021 Oct; 10(14):1035-1043. PubMed ID: 34279114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.