253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34924211)
1. Photoscreener results with and without cycloplegia and their reliability according to biometric parameters.
Guler Alis M; Alis A
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2022 Jan; 45(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 34924211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Instrument referral criteria for PlusoptiX and SureSight based on 2021 AAPOS guidelines: A population-based study.
Yan Q; Li R; Qian Y; Lin X; Zhu H; Wang Y; Zhao X; Zhang X; Sun Q; Hao Q; Tong H; Zhu Y; Li Z; Zhu Y; Liu H; Huang D
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():959757. PubMed ID: 36225773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The performance of visual photoscreening for Chinese preschool children aged 4 to 5 years].
Li R; Huang D; Zhu H; Sun QG; Wang Y; Zhang XH; Zhao XY; He J; Liu L; Zhou JJ; Liu H
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 56(3):189-196. PubMed ID: 32187947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Pediatric vision screening using the plusoptiX A12C photoscreener in Chinese preschool children aged 3 to 4 years.
Huang D; Chen X; Zhang X; Wang Y; Zhu H; Ding H; Bai J; Chen J; Fu Z; Wang Z; Liu H
Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2041. PubMed ID: 28515427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Refraction and ocular biometric parameters of preschool children in the Beijing whole childhood eye study: the first-year report.
Zhu B; Sun Y; Wang S; Qin X; Li L; Du B; Fu J; Wei R
BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Sep; 23(1):366. PubMed ID: 37670238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of PlusOptix A09 distance refraction in pediatric myopia and hyperopia.
Payerols A; Eliaou C; Trezeguet V; Villain M; Daien V
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Jun; 16():72. PubMed ID: 27246869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of photorefraction by Plusoptix A12 and cycloplegic autorefraction in children.
Ghadimi H; Nikdel M; Suh DW
BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Apr; 24(1):179. PubMed ID: 38641836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for refractive errors in children: the plusoptiX S08 and the Retinomax K-plus2 performed by a lay screener compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy.
Paff T; Oudesluys-Murphy AM; Wolterbeek R; Swart-van den Berg M; de Nie JM; Tijssen E; Schalij-Delfos NE
J AAPOS; 2010 Dec; 14(6):478-83. PubMed ID: 21168070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Significant Axial Elongation with Minimal Change in Refraction in 3- to 6-Year-Old Chinese Preschoolers: The Shenzhen Kindergarten Eye Study.
Guo X; Fu M; Ding X; Morgan IG; Zeng Y; He M
Ophthalmology; 2017 Dec; 124(12):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 28711218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the Plusoptix S09 with an autorefractometer of noncycloplegics and cycloplegics in children.
Won JY; Shin HY; Kim SY; Lee YC
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Aug; 95(35):e4596. PubMed ID: 27583875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of cycloplegic and noncycloplegic performance of spot vision screener in detection of amblyopia risk factors using 2021 AAPOS guidelines.
Bulut E; Dayi O; Celik Y; Bulut H; Başar E
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2024 Apr; 46():104073. PubMed ID: 38570151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of plusoptiX A12 measurements with cycloplegic refraction.
Fogel-Levin M; Doron R; Wygnanski-Jaffe T; Ancri O; Ben Zion I
J AAPOS; 2016 Aug; 20(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 27422572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation between refractive errors and ocular biometric parameters in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang Z; Mu J; Wei J; Geng H; Liu C; Yi W; Sun Y; Duan J
BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):472. PubMed ID: 37990308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is noncycloplegic photorefraction applicable for screening refractive amblyopia risk factors?
Rajavi Z; Parsafar H; Ramezani A; Yaseri M
J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2012 Jan; 7(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 22737380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Difference of refraction values between standard autorefractometry and Plusoptix.
Bogdănici CM; Săndulache CM; Vasiliu R; Obadă O
Rom J Ophthalmol; 2016; 60(4):249-254. PubMed ID: 29450357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of the Plusoptix A09 photoscreener in detecting amblyopia risk factors in Chinese children attending an eye clinic.
Yan XR; Jiao WZ; Li ZW; Xu WW; Li FJ; Wang LH
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0126052. PubMed ID: 26030210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Refraction and ocular biometric parameters in 3-to 6-year-old preschool children : a large-scale population-based study in Chengdu, China.
Mu J; Zhang Z; Wu X; Chen S; Geng H; Duan J
BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 24(1):207. PubMed ID: 38711043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [An investigative study on the correlation between refractive status and ocular biometric parameters in 3-6-year-old children in Shunyi District, Beijing, China].
Yuan J; Xu Q; Zhu LT; Jiang AM
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 59(8):636-642. PubMed ID: 37550971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Distribution of ocular biometry in young Chinese eyes: The Anyang University Students Eye Study.
Sun Y; Wei S; Li S; Cao K; Hu J; Yang X; Lin C; An W; Guo J; Li H; Fu J; Wang N
Acta Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 99(6):621-627. PubMed ID: 33326192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ocular biometrics and uncorrected visual acuity for detecting myopia in Chinese school students.
Zhao E; Wang X; Zhang H; Zhao E; Wang J; Yang Y; Gu F; Gu L; Huang J; Zhang R; Ying GS; Cui H
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):18644. PubMed ID: 36333404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
