These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34926087)

  • 1. Automated Breast Volume Assessment Derived From Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images Compared to Mastectomy Specimen Weight and Its Applications in Cosmetic Optimisation.
    Munir A; Huws AM; Khawaja S; Khan S; Holt S; Sharaiha Y
    Cureus; 2021 Nov; 13(11):e19642. PubMed ID: 34926087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography with a fully automated breast volumetric software as a novel method for estimating the preoperative breast volume prior to mastectomy.
    Kim JS; Bae K; Lee EJ; Bang M
    Ann Surg Treat Res; 2021 Jun; 100(6):313-319. PubMed ID: 34136427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast density (BD) assessment with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): Agreement between Quantra™ and 5th edition BI-RADS
    Ekpo EU; Mello-Thoms C; Rickard M; Brennan PC; McEntee MF
    Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():185-190. PubMed ID: 27769015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
    Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated volumetric breast density estimation out of digital breast tomosynthesis data: feasibility study of a new software version.
    Machida Y; Saita A; Namba H; Fukuma E
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):780. PubMed ID: 27386266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization.
    Castillo-García M; Chevalier M; Garayoa J; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; García-Pinto D; Valverde J
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):802-810. PubMed ID: 28214227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implant volume estimation in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
    Shia WC; Yang HJ; Wu HK; Lin SL; Lai HW; Huang YL; Chen DR
    J Surg Res; 2018 Nov; 231():290-296. PubMed ID: 30278942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammographic density estimation: one-to-one comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using fully automated software.
    Tagliafico A; Tagliafico G; Astengo D; Cavagnetto F; Rosasco R; Rescinito G; Monetti F; Calabrese M
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1265-70. PubMed ID: 22358426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Prospective Investigation of Predictive Parameters for Preoperative Volume Assessment in Breast Reconstruction.
    Zingaretti N; Miotti G; Maronese CA; Isola M; Guarneri GF; Albanese R; De Francesco F; Riccio M; Cereser L; Zuiani C; Parodi PC
    J Clin Med; 2021 Nov; 10(22):. PubMed ID: 34830498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of the Ideal Implant Size Using 3-Dimensional Healthy Breast Volume in Unilateral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.
    Kim JH; Park JW; Woo KJ
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Sep; 56(10):. PubMed ID: 32987779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital breast volume estimation (DBVE)-A new technique.
    Shanley E; Johnston A; Hillick D; Ng KC; Sugrue M
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 91(1091):20180406. PubMed ID: 30028189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient Satisfaction with Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Associated with Implant Volume and Mastectomy Specimen Weight Ratio.
    Baek WY; Byun IH; Kim YS; Lew DH; Jeong J; Roh TS
    J Breast Cancer; 2017 Mar; 20(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 28382100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of breast tomosynthesis in a predominantly dense breast population at a tertiary breast centre: breast density assessment and diagnostic performance in comparison with MRI.
    Förnvik D; Kataoka M; Iima M; Ohashi A; Kanao S; Toi M; Togashi K
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3194-3203. PubMed ID: 29460074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of Mastectomy Volume Using Preoperative Mastectomy Simulation Images Acquired by the Vectra H2 System.
    Kim J; Matsumine H; Niimi Y; Osada A; Sakurai H
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2023 Aug; 11(8):e5180. PubMed ID: 37577246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of percentage breast tissue density: comparison between digital mammography (2D full field digital mammography) and digital breast tomosynthesis according to different BI-RADS categories.
    Tagliafico AS; Tagliafico G; Cavagnetto F; Calabrese M; Houssami N
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 86(1031):20130255. PubMed ID: 24029631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer.
    Duffy SW; Morrish OWE; Allgood PC; Black R; Gillan MGC; Willsher P; Cooke J; Duncan KA; Michell MJ; Dobson HM; Maroni R; Lim YY; Purushothaman HN; Suaris T; Astley SM; Young KC; Tucker L; Gilbert FJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Jan; 88():48-56. PubMed ID: 29190506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiological assessment of breast density by visual classification (BI-RADS) compared to automated volumetric digital software (Quantra): implications for clinical practice.
    Regini E; Mariscotti G; Durando M; Ghione G; Luparia A; Campanino PP; Bianchi CC; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Radiol Med; 2014 Oct; 119(10):741-9. PubMed ID: 24610166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
    Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology, Specimen Radiography System (SRS) and Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Can Optimise Surgical Therapy?
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Dilbat G; Bani M; Fasching PA; Heusinger K; Lux MP; Loehberg CR; Brehm B; Hammon M; Saake M; Dankerl P; Jud SM; Rauh C; Bayer CM; Beckmann MW; Uder M; Meier-Meitinger M
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2013 May; 73(5):422-427. PubMed ID: 24771921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.