These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34926087)

  • 21. Comparing recall rates following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis to synthetic 2D images and digital mammography on women with breast-conserving surgery.
    Yoon JH; Kim EK; Kim GR; Han K; Kim MJ; Park VY; Moon HJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6072-6079. PubMed ID: 32529566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Radiation dose with digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography: per-view analysis.
    Gennaro G; Bernardi D; Houssami N
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):573-581. PubMed ID: 28819862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening.
    Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P
    Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis for detection of breast cancer in the intraoperative specimen during breast-conserving surgery.
    Urano M; Shiraki N; Kawai T; Goto T; Endo Y; Yoshimoto N; Toyama T; Shibamoto Y
    Breast Cancer; 2016 Sep; 23(5):706-11. PubMed ID: 26198975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast percent density: estimation on digital mammograms and central tomosynthesis projections.
    Bakic PR; Carton AK; Kontos D; Zhang C; Troxel AB; Maidment AD
    Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 19420321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone.
    Gilbert FJ; Tucker L; Gillan MG; Willsher P; Cooke J; Duncan KA; Michell MJ; Dobson HM; Lim YY; Purushothaman H; Strudley C; Astley SM; Morrish O; Young KC; Duffy SW
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(4):i-xxv, 1-136. PubMed ID: 25599513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Study of the Relation Between Mastectomy Specimen Weight and Volume With Implant Size in Oncoplastic Reconstruction.
    Wazir U; El Hage Chehade H; Choy C; Kasem A; Mokbel K
    In Vivo; 2019; 33(1):125-132. PubMed ID: 30587612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnostic accuracy of resection margin in specimen radiography: digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography.
    Romanucci G; Mercogliano S; Carucci E; Cina A; Zantedeschi E; Caneva A; Benassuti C; Fornasa F
    Radiol Med; 2021 Jun; 126(6):768-773. PubMed ID: 33625658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measurement of breast density with digital breast tomosynthesis--a systematic review.
    Ekpo EU; McEntee MF
    Br J Radiol; 2014 Nov; 87(1043):20140460. PubMed ID: 25146640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative estimation of percentage breast tissue density for digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Tagliafico A; Tagliafico G; Astengo D; Airaldi S; Calabrese M; Houssami N
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Feb; 138(1):311-7. PubMed ID: 23338763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-based breast volumetry for immediate breast reconstruction.
    Kim H; Mun GH; Wiraatmadja ES; Lim SY; Pyon JK; Oh KS; Lee JE; Nam SJ; Bang SI
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 39(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 25924697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk assessment.
    Kontos D; Ikejimba LC; Bakic PR; Troxel AB; Conant EF; Maidment AD
    Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 21771961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
    Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetric analysis and its relationship to actual breast weight.
    Yoo A; Minn KW; Jin US
    Arch Plast Surg; 2013 May; 40(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 23730594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Practice Patterns Following 2011 FDA Approval: A Survey of Breast Imaging Radiologists.
    Gao Y; Babb JS; Toth HK; Moy L; Heller SL
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):947-953. PubMed ID: 28188043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Screening Mammography Performance Metrics of 2D Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
    Chikarmane SA; Cochon LR; Khorasani R; Sahu S; Giess CS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):587-594. PubMed ID: 32966113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing Visually Assessed BI-RADS Breast Density and Automated Volumetric Breast Density Software: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Breast Cancer Screening Setting.
    van der Waal D; den Heeten GJ; Pijnappel RM; Schuur KH; Timmers JM; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136667. PubMed ID: 26335569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A software-based x-ray scatter correction method for breast tomosynthesis.
    Jia Feng SS; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6643-53. PubMed ID: 22149846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantra™ should be considered a tool for two-grade scale mammographic breast density classification.
    Ekpo EU; McEntee MF; Rickard M; Brennan PC; Kunduri J; Demchig D; Mello-Thoms C
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1060):20151057. PubMed ID: 26882045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.