These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34926203)

  • 1. Comparison of imo and Humphrey field analyzer perimeters in glaucomatous eyes.
    Nakai Y; Bessho K; Shono Y; Taoka K; Nakai Y
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2021; 14(12):1882-1887. PubMed ID: 34926203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of head-mounted perimeter (imo
    Kimura T; Matsumoto C; Nomoto H
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2019; 13():501-513. PubMed ID: 30936681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Humphrey Field Analyzer and imo visual field test results in patients with glaucoma and pseudo-fixation loss.
    Goukon H; Hirasawa K; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shoji N
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224711. PubMed ID: 31697732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retinal Sensitivity Thresholds Obtained Through Easyfield and Humphrey Perimeters in Eyes with Glaucoma: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.
    Nazareth T; Rocha J; Scoralick ALB; Dias DT; Gracitelli CPB; Kanadani FN; Prata TS
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2020; 14():4201-4207. PubMed ID: 33299296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter 'imo'.
    Matsumoto C; Yamao S; Nomoto H; Takada S; Okuyama S; Kimura S; Yamanaka K; Aihara M; Shimomura Y
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161974. PubMed ID: 27564382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advanced Vision Analyzer-Virtual Reality Perimeter: Device Validation, Functional Correlation and Comparison with Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Narang P; Agarwal A; Srinivasan M; Agarwal A
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2021 Jun; 1(2):100035. PubMed ID: 36249304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study.
    Ahmed Y; Pereira A; Bowden S; Shi RB; Li Y; Ahmed IIK; Arshinoff SA
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(2):146-159. PubMed ID: 34358734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perimetric Comparison Between the IMOvifa and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Nishida T; Eslani M; Weinreb RN; Arias J; Vasile C; Mohammadzadeh V; Moghimi S
    J Glaucoma; 2023 Feb; 32(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 36223309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Performance of a Novel, Smartphone-based, Head-mounted Perimeter (GearVision) With the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Pradhan ZS; Sircar T; Agrawal H; Rao HL; Bopardikar A; Devi S; Tiwari VN
    J Glaucoma; 2021 Apr; 30(4):e146-e152. PubMed ID: 33596021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Kang J; De Arrigunaga S; Freeman SE; Zhao Y; Lin M; Liebman DL; Roldan AM; Kim JA; Chang DS; Friedman DS; Elze T
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(5):509-520. PubMed ID: 36918066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of an LCD-Based Visual Field System.
    Joo JH; Lee J; You H; Kang J
    J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Jan; 33(3):e19. PubMed ID: 29215806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Visual acuity perimetry. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects].
    Reiser EM; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 1486263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Agreement in the detection of chiasmal and postchiasmal visual field defects between imo binocular random single-eye test and Humphrey monocular test.
    Sakamoto M; Sawamura H; Aihara M; Goseki T; Ikeda T; Ishikawa H; Nakamura M
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 66(5):413-424. PubMed ID: 35972588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of visual field sensitivities between the Medmont automated perimeter and the Humphrey field analyser.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham SL
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 38(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 20447123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Visual Field Measurement with Heidelberg Edge Perimeter and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in Patients with Ocular Hypertension.
    Kaczorowski K; Mulak M; Szumny D; Baranowska M; Jakubaszko-Jabłońska J; Misiuk-Hojło M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2016; 25(5):937-944. PubMed ID: 28028959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Compass and Humphrey perimeters in detecting glaucomatous defects.
    Fogagnolo P; Modarelli A; Oddone F; Digiuni M; Montesano G; Orzalesi N; Rossetti L
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 26(6):598-606. PubMed ID: 27375066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Matrix with Humphrey Field Analyzer II with SITA.
    Fredette MJ; Giguère A; Anderson DR; Budenz DL; McSoley J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 25875683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Novel Visual Field Screening Program for Glaucoma With a Head-Mounted Perimeter.
    Arai K; Nishijima E; Ogawa S; Hosaka D; Itoh Y; Noro T; Okude S; Okada S; Yoshikawa K; Nakano T
    J Glaucoma; 2023 Jun; 32(6):520-525. PubMed ID: 36847662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Challenges to detect glaucomatous visual field loss with pupil perimetry.
    Asakawa K; Shoji N
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2019; 13():1621-1625. PubMed ID: 31692539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic ability of Humphrey perimetry, Octopus perimetry, and optical coherence tomography for glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
    Monsalve B; Ferreras A; Calvo P; Urcola JA; Figus M; Monsalve J; Frezzotti P
    Eye (Lond); 2017 Mar; 31(3):443-451. PubMed ID: 27834960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.