172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34927219)
1. Modeling Faking in the Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format: The Faking Mixture Model.
Frick S
Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):773-794. PubMed ID: 34927219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does multidimensional forced-choice prevent faking? Comparing the susceptibility of the multidimensional forced-choice format and the rating scale format to faking.
Wetzel E; Frick S; Brown A
Psychol Assess; 2021 Feb; 33(2):156-170. PubMed ID: 33151727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does forcing reduce faking? A meta-analytic review of forced-choice personality measures in high-stakes situations.
Cao M; Drasgow F
J Appl Psychol; 2019 Nov; 104(11):1347-1368. PubMed ID: 31070382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format Character Measure: Testing the Thurstonian IRT Approach.
Ng V; Lee P; Ho MR; Kuykendall L; Stark S; Tay L
J Pers Assess; 2021; 103(2):224-237. PubMed ID: 32208939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intermittent faking of personality profiles in high-stakes assessments: A grade of membership analysis.
Brown A; Böckenholt U
Psychol Methods; 2022 Oct; 27(5):895-916. PubMed ID: 35007104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance.
Heggestad ED; Morrison M; Reeve CL; McCloy RA
J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jan; 91(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 16435935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A dual process item response theory model for polytomous multidimensional forced-choice items.
Qiu X; de la Torre J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):491-512. PubMed ID: 36967236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Examining faking on personality inventories using unfolding item response theory models.
Scherbaum CA; Sabet J; Kern MJ; Agnello P
J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 23030769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Item placement on a personality measure: effects on faking behavior and test measurement properties.
McFarland LA; Ryan AM; Ellis A
J Pers Assess; 2002 Apr; 78(2):348-69. PubMed ID: 12067198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integration of the Forced-Choice Questionnaire and the Likert Scale: A Simulation Study.
Xiao Y; Liu H; Li H
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():806. PubMed ID: 28572781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. GGUM-RANK Statement and Person Parameter Estimation With Multidimensional Forced Choice Triplets.
Lee P; Joo SH; Stark S; Chernyshenko OS
Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 May; 43(3):226-240. PubMed ID: 31019358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Taking the Test Taker's Perspective: Response Process and Test Motivation in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Versus Rating Scale Instruments.
Sass R; Frick S; Reips UD; Wetzel E
Assessment; 2020 Apr; 27(3):572-584. PubMed ID: 29560735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Forced-Choice Response Format Reduce Faking of Socially Aversive Personality Traits?
Valone ALY; Meade AW
J Pers Assess; 2024 Mar; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 38501713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can Faking Be Measured With Dedicated Validity Scales? Within-Subject Trifactor Mixture Modeling Applied to BIDR Responses.
Guenole N; Brown A; Lim V
Assessment; 2023 Jul; 30(5):1523-1542. PubMed ID: 35786013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing forced-choice and single-stimulus personality scores on a level playing field: A meta-analysis of psychometric properties and susceptibility to faking.
Speer AB; Wegmeyer LJ; Tenbrink AP; Delacruz AY; Christiansen ND; Salim RM
J Appl Psychol; 2023 Nov; 108(11):1812-1833. PubMed ID: 37326537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing the validity of trait estimates from the multidimensional forced-choice format and the rating scale format.
Wetzel E; Frick S
Psychol Assess; 2020 Mar; 32(3):239-253. PubMed ID: 31738070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigating the Normativity of Trait Estimates from Multidimensional Forced-Choice Data.
Frick S; Brown A; Wetzel E
Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 34464217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On Bank Assembly and Block Selection in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Adaptive Assessments.
Kreitchmann RS; Sorrel MA; Abad FJ
Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Apr; 83(2):294-321. PubMed ID: 36866066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correction for faking in self-report personality tests.
Sjöberg L
Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 26043667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Controlling social desirability may attenuate faking effects: a study with aggression measures.
Anguiano-Carrasco C; Vigil-Colet A; Ferrando PJ
Psicothema; 2013; 25(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 23628529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
