These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34928486)

  • 1. Effects of temporal and spatiotemporal cues on detection of dynamic road hazards.
    Wolfe B; Kosovicheva A; Stent S; Rosenholtz R
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Dec; 6(1):80. PubMed ID: 34928486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-modal warnings for orienting attention in older drivers with and without attention impairments.
    Lees MN; Cosman J; Lee JD; Vecera SP; Dawson JD; Rizzo M
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):768-76. PubMed ID: 22204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Taking prevalence effects on the road: Rare hazards are often missed.
    Kosovicheva A; Wolfe JM; Wolfe B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Feb; 30(1):212-223. PubMed ID: 35953668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The interaction of cognitive load and attention-directing cues in driving.
    Lee YC; Lee JD; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2009 Jun; 51(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 19750791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid holistic perception and evasion of road hazards.
    Wolfe B; Seppelt B; Mehler B; Reimer B; Rosenholtz R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Mar; 149(3):490-500. PubMed ID: 31343185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Road Hazard Stimuli: Annotated naturalistic road videos for studying hazard detection and scene perception.
    Song J; Kosovicheva A; Wolfe B
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):4188-4204. PubMed ID: 38082115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of display-to-display feature changes on net cueing effects: Evidence for a contribution of object-file updating.
    Schoeberl T; Goller F; Ansorge U
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jun; 73(6):908-919. PubMed ID: 31931666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatio-temporal localisation of attentional orienting to gaze and peripheral cues.
    Nagata Y; Bayless SJ; Mills T; Taylor MJ
    Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 1439():44-53. PubMed ID: 22277356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aging effects in cueing tasks as assessed by the ideal observer: peripheral cues.
    Swan EF; Hutchinson CV; Everard M; Shimozaki SS
    J Vis; 2015 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 25761344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deconstructing Reorienting of Attention: Cue Predictiveness Modulates the Inhibition of the No-target Side and the Hemispheric Distribution of the P1 Response to Invalid Targets.
    Doricchi F; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Pinto M; Caratelli L; Cestari V; Rossi-Arnaud C; Lasaponara S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1046-1060. PubMed ID: 31967519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return.
    Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection costs and contingent attentional capture.
    Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):429-437. PubMed ID: 27896707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and validation of the Spanish Hazard Perception Test.
    Castro C; Padilla JL; Roca J; Benítez I; García-Fernández P; Estévez B; López-Ramón MF; Crundall D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(8):817-26. PubMed ID: 24433083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eye-movement patterns to social and non-social cues in early deaf adults.
    Bonmassar C; Pavani F; Di Renzo A; Caselli MC; van Zoest W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jun; 74(6):1021-1036. PubMed ID: 33586487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implicit learning of spatiotemporal contingencies in spatial cueing.
    Rieth CA; Huber DE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1165-80. PubMed ID: 23181686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional networks functioning, age, and attentional lapses while driving.
    López-Ramón MF; Castro C; Roca J; Ledesma R; Lupiañez J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Oct; 12(5):518-28. PubMed ID: 21972863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.
    Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():207-216. PubMed ID: 27209155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.