192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34928675)
1. Alleviating estimation problems in small sample structural equation modeling-A comparison of constrained maximum likelihood, Bayesian estimation, and fixed reliability approaches.
Ulitzsch E; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A
Psychol Methods; 2023 Jun; 28(3):527-557. PubMed ID: 34928675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comparison of ML, WLSMV, and Bayesian Methods for Multilevel Structural Equation Models in Small Samples: A Simulation Study.
Holtmann J; Koch T; Lochner K; Eid M
Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):661-680. PubMed ID: 27594086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More stable estimation of the STARTS model: A Bayesian approach using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques.
Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A; Wagner J
Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):570-593. PubMed ID: 29172612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of several approaches for controlling measurement error in small samples.
Savalei V
Psychol Methods; 2019 Jun; 24(3):352-370. PubMed ID: 29781637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models With Small Sample Sizes.
Lüdtke O; Ulitzsch E; Robitzsch A
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():615162. PubMed ID: 33995176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multilevel modeling of single-case data: A comparison of maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation.
Moeyaert M; Rindskopf D; Onghena P; Van den Noortgate W
Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):760-778. PubMed ID: 28358542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating Factorial Invariance: An Interval Estimation Approach Using Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling.
Shi D; Song H; DiStefano C; Maydeu-Olivares A; McDaniel HL; Jiang Z
Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(2):224-245. PubMed ID: 30569738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prior sensitivity analysis in default Bayesian structural equation modeling.
van Erp S; Mulder J; Oberski DL
Psychol Methods; 2018 Jun; 23(2):363-388. PubMed ID: 29172613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing interval estimates for small sample ordinal CFA models.
Natesan P
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1599. PubMed ID: 26579002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.
Grantham KL; Kasza J; Heritier S; Carlin JB; Forbes AB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):112. PubMed ID: 35418034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adapting fit indices for Bayesian structural equation modeling: Comparison to maximum likelihood.
Garnier-Villarreal M; Jorgensen TD
Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):46-70. PubMed ID: 31180693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Metropolis Monte Carlo implementation of bayesian time-domain parameter estimation: application to coupling constant estimation from antiphase multiplets.
Andrec M; Prestegard JH
J Magn Reson; 1998 Feb; 130(2):217-32. PubMed ID: 9500892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance comparison of first-order conditional estimation with interaction and Bayesian estimation methods for estimating the population parameters and its distribution from data sets with a low number of subjects.
Pradhan S; Song B; Lee J; Chae JW; Kim KI; Back HM; Han N; Kwon KI; Yun HY
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):154. PubMed ID: 29191177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Seemingly unrelated regression with measurement error: estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo and mean field variational Bayes approximation.
Bresson G; Chaturvedi A; Rahman MA; Shalabh
Int J Biostat; 2020 Sep; 17(1):75-97. PubMed ID: 32949454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mixture class recovery in GMM under varying degrees of class separation: frequentist versus Bayesian estimation.
Depaoli S
Psychol Methods; 2013 Jun; 18(2):186-219. PubMed ID: 23527607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian approach to decompression sickness model parameter estimation.
Howle LE; Weber PW; Nichols JM
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Mar; 82():3-11. PubMed ID: 28119191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing estimators for latent interaction models under structural and distributional misspecifications.
Brandt H; Umbach N; Kelava A; Bollen KA
Psychol Methods; 2020 Jun; 25(3):321-345. PubMed ID: 31670539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum-likelihood inference of population genetic parameters.
Beerli P
Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 22(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 16317072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
