141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34928677)
1. Comparing estimation methods for psychometric networks with ordinal data.
Johal SK; Rhemtulla M
Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; 28(6):1251-1272. PubMed ID: 34928677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On Penalty Parameter Selection for Estimating Network Models.
Wysocki AC; Rhemtulla M
Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(2):288-302. PubMed ID: 31672065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contributions to Estimation of Polychoric Correlations.
Monroe S
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(2):247-266. PubMed ID: 29377713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparison of ML, WLSMV, and Bayesian Methods for Multilevel Structural Equation Models in Small Samples: A Simulation Study.
Holtmann J; Koch T; Lochner K; Eid M
Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):661-680. PubMed ID: 27594086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Polychoric Correlation With Ordinal Data in Nursing Research.
Kiwanuka F; Kopra J; Sak-Dankosky N; Nanyonga RC; Kvist T
Nurs Res; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 71(6):469-476. PubMed ID: 35997708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Which estimation method to choose in network psychometrics? Deriving guidelines for applied researchers.
Isvoranu AM; Epskamp S
Psychol Methods; 2023 Aug; 28(4):925-946. PubMed ID: 34843277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of logistic regression methods for Ising model estimation.
Brusco MJ; Steinley D; Watts AL
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; 55(7):3566-3584. PubMed ID: 36266525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selecting polychoric instrumental variables in confirmatory factor analysis: An alternative specification test and effects of instrumental variables.
Jin S; Cao C
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):387-413. PubMed ID: 29323415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing community detection algorithms in psychometric networks: A Monte Carlo simulation.
Christensen AP; Garrido LE; Guerra-Peña K; Golino H
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1485-1505. PubMed ID: 37326769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Exploratory Diagnostic Model for Ordinal Responses with Binary Attributes: Identifiability and Estimation.
Culpepper SA
Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):921-940. PubMed ID: 31432312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of sample size for computation of the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) in multilevel modeling.
Lorah J; Womack A
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):440-450. PubMed ID: 30684229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of ordinal scales on Gaussian mixture recovery.
Haslbeck JMB; Vermunt JK; Waldorp LJ
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Jun; 55(4):2143-2156. PubMed ID: 35831565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables.
Li CH
Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):369-87. PubMed ID: 27571021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of the latent mediated effect with ordinal data using the limited-information and Bayesian full-information approaches.
Chen J; Zhang D; Choi J
Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1260-1273. PubMed ID: 25361865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alleviating estimation problems in small sample structural equation modeling-A comparison of constrained maximum likelihood, Bayesian estimation, and fixed reliability approaches.
Ulitzsch E; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A
Psychol Methods; 2023 Jun; 28(3):527-557. PubMed ID: 34928675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Weighted lasso in graphical Gaussian modeling for large gene network estimation based on microarray data.
Shimamura T; Imoto S; Yamaguchi R; Miyano S
Genome Inform; 2007; 19():142-53. PubMed ID: 18546512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian compositional models for ordinal response.
Zhang L; Zhang X; Leach JM; Rahman AF; Yi N
Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 Jun; 33(6):1043-1054. PubMed ID: 38654396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Heterogeneity estimation in meta-analysis of standardized mean differences when the distribution of random effects departs from normal: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Blázquez-Rincón D; Sánchez-Meca J; Botella J; Suero M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 36650428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
