These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34928729)

  • 1. Considerations on the region of interest in the ROC space.
    Lavazza L; Morasca S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Mar; 31(3):419-437. PubMed ID: 34928729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: practical review for radiologists.
    Park SH; Goo JM; Jo CH
    Korean J Radiol; 2004; 5(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 15064554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disadvantages of using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess imaging tests: a discussion and proposal for an alternative approach.
    Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):932-9. PubMed ID: 25599932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-way partial AUC and its properties.
    Yang H; Lu K; Lyu X; Hu F
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):184-195. PubMed ID: 28707503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Jackknife variance of the partial area under the empirical receiver operating characteristic curve.
    Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):528-541. PubMed ID: 25228637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
    Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new concordant partial AUC and partial c statistic for imbalanced data in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms.
    Carrington AM; Fieguth PW; Qazi H; Holzinger A; Chen HH; Mayr F; Manuel DG
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jan; 20(1):4. PubMed ID: 31906931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves To Optimize Discovery-Based Software with Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography with Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry.
    Reaser BC; Wright BW; Synovec RE
    Anal Chem; 2017 Mar; 89(6):3606-3612. PubMed ID: 28207236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of methods for estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
    Centor RM; Schwartz JS
    Med Decis Making; 1985; 5(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 3841685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The average receiver operating characteristic curve in multireader multicase imaging studies.
    Chen W; Samuelson FW
    Br J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 87(1040):20140016. PubMed ID: 24884728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ROCS: receiver operating characteristic surface for class-skewed high-throughput data.
    Yu T
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e40598. PubMed ID: 22792381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bootstrap-based procedures for inference in nonparametric receiver-operating characteristic curve regression analysis.
    Rodríguez-Álvarez MX; Roca-Pardiñas J; Cadarso-Suárez C; Tahoces PG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):740-764. PubMed ID: 29233083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves on the basis of optimal operating points.
    Halpern EJ; Albert M; Krieger AM; Metz CE; Maidment AD
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Mar; 3(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 8796672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) should replace the ROC AUC as the standard metric for assessing binary classification.
    Chicco D; Jurman G
    BioData Min; 2023 Feb; 16(1):4. PubMed ID: 36800973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Smooth time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve estimators.
    Martínez-Camblor P; Pardo-Fernández JC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):651-674. PubMed ID: 29187044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of cervical sonography to differentiate true from false labor in term patients presenting for labor check.
    Kunzier NB; Kinzler WL; Chavez MR; Adams TM; Brand DA; Vintzileos AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 215(3):372.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27018468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variability of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves in the diagnostic evaluation of liver fibrosis markers: impact of biopsy length and fragmentation.
    Poynard T; Halfon P; Castera L; Charlotte F; Le Bail B; Munteanu M; Messous D; Ratziu V; Benhamou Y; Bourlière M; De Ledinghen V;
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Mar; 25(6):733-9. PubMed ID: 17311607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An extension of the receiver operating characteristic curve and AUC-optimal classification.
    Takenouchi T; Komori O; Eguchi S
    Neural Comput; 2012 Oct; 24(10):2789-824. PubMed ID: 22734493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.
    Obuchowski NA; McClish DK
    Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1529-42. PubMed ID: 9249923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.