207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34928886)
1. Supervised Machine Learning for Predicting Length of Stay After Lumbar Arthrodesis: A Comprehensive Artificial Intelligence Approach.
Etzel CM; Veeramani A; Zhang AS; McDonald CL; DiSilvestro KJ; Cohen EM; Daniels AH
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 Feb; 30(3):125-132. PubMed ID: 34928886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting Readmission After Anterior, Posterior, and Posterior Interbody Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Neural Network Machine Learning Approach.
Kuris EO; Veeramani A; McDonald CL; DiSilvestro KJ; Zhang AS; Cohen EM; Daniels AH
World Neurosurg; 2021 Jul; 151():e19-e27. PubMed ID: 33744425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Approach-based Comparative and Predictor Analysis of 30-day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.
Katz AD; Mancini N; Karukonda T; Greenwood M; Cote M; Moss IL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Mar; 44(6):432-441. PubMed ID: 30138253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Longitudinal Trends of Patient Demographics and Morbidity of Different Approaches in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Oezel L; Okano I; Hughes AP; Sarin M; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Soffin EM
World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e183-e193. PubMed ID: 35472646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of lumbar interbody fusion surgery on postoperative outcomes in patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation: Analysis of the US national inpatient sample.
Ye YP; Hu JW; Zhang YG; Xu H
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 70():20-26. PubMed ID: 31630917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.
Goz V; Weinreb JH; Schwab F; Lafage V; Errico TJ
Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2019-27. PubMed ID: 24333459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploratory meta-analysis on dose-related efficacy and morbidity of bone morphogenetic protein in spinal arthrodesis surgery.
Hofstetter CP; Hofer AS; Levi AD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):457-75. PubMed ID: 26613283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of the effects of anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on vibration characteristics of the human lumbar spine.
Fan W; Guo LX
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Apr; 22(5):490-498. PubMed ID: 30714396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in revision surgery for restenosis after posterior decompression.
Kudo Y; Okano I; Toyone T; Matsuoka A; Maruyama H; Yamamura R; Ishikawa K; Hayakawa C; Tani S; Sekimizu M; Hoshino Y; Ozawa T; Shirahata T; Fujita M; Oshita Y; Emori H; Omata H; Inagaki K
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E11. PubMed ID: 32871574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; McGirt MJ; Asher AL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 26895529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.
Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY
Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improvement of coronal alignment in fractional low lumbar curves with the use of anterior interbody devices.
Geddes B; Glassman SD; Mkorombindo T; Gardner JQ; Carreon LY
Spine Deform; 2021 Sep; 9(5):1443-1447. PubMed ID: 33740230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Outcomes of Anterior, Posterior, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery at a Single Lumbar Level with Degenerative Spinal Disease.
Lee N; Kim KN; Yi S; Ha Y; Shin DA; Yoon DH; Kim KS
World Neurosurg; 2017 May; 101():216-226. PubMed ID: 28189865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.
Divi SN; Schroeder GD; Goyal DKC; Radcliff KE; Galetta MS; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Kurd MF; Rihn JA; Kaye ID; Woods BR; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 31356987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The cost-effectiveness of interbody fusions versus posterolateral fusions in 137 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Bydon M; Macki M; Abt NB; Witham TF; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Sciubba DM
Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 25463402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1.
Jacob KC; Patel MR; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():e111-e122. PubMed ID: 34610449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of (Partial) economic evaluations of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in adults with lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review.
Caelers IJMH; de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Hemert WLW; de Bie RA; Evers SMAA; van Santbrink H
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245963. PubMed ID: 33571291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone.
Macki M; Bydon M; Weingart R; Sciubba D; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Witham T
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 138():117-23. PubMed ID: 26318363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
