BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34928886)

  • 21. Functional and radiological outcome of anterior retroperitoneal versus posterior transforaminal interbody fusion in the management of single-level lumbar degenerative disease.
    Bassani R; Morselli C; Querenghi AM; Nuara A; Sconfienza LM; Peretti GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E2. PubMed ID: 32871567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Benefit of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion vs Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Lumbar Spine Disorders: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From the National Neurosurgical Quality and Outcomes Database Registry.
    Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Ghogawala Z; Foley KT; McGirt MJ; Asher AL
    Neurosurgery; 2016 Sep; 79(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 26579968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ploumis A; Wu C; Fischer G; Mehbod AA; Wu W; Faundez A; Transfeldt EE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 18391717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Single position lateral decubitus anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior fusion reduces complications and improves perioperative outcomes compared with traditional anterior-posterior lumbar fusion.
    Ashayeri K; Leon C; Tigchelaar S; Fatemi P; Follett M; Cheng I; Thomas JA; Medley M; Braly B; Kwon B; Eisen L; Protopsaltis TS; Buckland AJ
    Spine J; 2022 Mar; 22(3):419-428. PubMed ID: 34600110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes.
    Crandall DG; Revella J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):2126-33. PubMed ID: 19752698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Lin GX; Park CK; Hur JW; Kim JS
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2019 Jun; 59(6):222-230. PubMed ID: 31068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT).
    de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Kuijk SM; Evers SM; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):417. PubMed ID: 27716168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Systematic Review of Lumbar Fusion Rates With and Without the Use of rhBMP-2.
    Galimberti F; Lubelski D; Healy AT; Wang T; Abdullah KG; Nowacki AS; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(14):1132-9. PubMed ID: 25955186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Outcomes of anterior vs. posterior approach to single-level lumbar spinal fusion with interbody device: An analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample.
    De Stefano F; Haddad H; Mayo T; Nouman M; Fiani B
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 212():107061. PubMed ID: 34863055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Revision of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical study in nonosteoporotic bone.
    Ploumis A; Wu C; Mehbod A; Fischer G; Faundez A; Wu W; Transfeldt E
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jan; 12(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 20043769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis.
    Whitecloud TS; Roesch WW; Ricciardi JE
    J Spinal Disord; 2001 Apr; 14(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 11285420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparative study of perioperative complications between transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Liu J; Deng H; Long X; Chen X; Xu R; Liu Z
    Eur Spine J; 2016 May; 25(5):1575-1580. PubMed ID: 26126415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Circumferential fusion: a comparative analysis between anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Tye EY; Tanenbaum JE; Alonso AS; Xiao R; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Savage JW
    Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):464-471. PubMed ID: 28821444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity.
    Mehta VA; McGirt MJ; Garcés Ambrossi GL; Parker SL; Sciubba DM; Bydon A; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Witham TF
    Neurol Res; 2011 Jan; 33(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 20546682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Finite Element Analysis of the Vibration Characteristics of Fused Lumbar Spine.
    Fan W; Guo LX; Zhao D
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Jun; 150():e81-e88. PubMed ID: 33647495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Indirect decompression via oblique lateral interbody fusion for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study with direct decompression transforaminal/posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Shimizu T; Fujibayashi S; Otsuki B; Murata K; Matsuda S
    Spine J; 2021 Jun; 21(6):963-971. PubMed ID: 33540124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF.
    Teng I; Han J; Phan K; Mobbs R
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 44():11-17. PubMed ID: 28676316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro comparison of endplate preparation between four mini-open interbody fusion approaches.
    Tatsumi R; Lee YP; Khajavi K; Taylor W; Chen F; Bae H
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Apr; 24 Suppl 3():372-7. PubMed ID: 25874742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.