BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34928999)

  • 1. Different contra-sound effects between noise and music stimuli seen in N1m and psychophysical responses.
    Shirakura M; Kawase T; Kanno A; Ohta J; Nakasato N; Kawashima R; Katori Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261637. PubMed ID: 34928999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
    Sasaki T; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Ogura M; Tominaga T; Kobayashi T
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Possibility of additive effects by the presentation of visual information related to distractor sounds on the contra-sound effects of the N100m responses.
    Takai S; Kanno A; Kawase T; Shirakura M; Suzuki J; Nakasato N; Kawashima R; Katori Y
    Hear Res; 2023 Jul; 434():108778. PubMed ID: 37105052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neuromagnetic responses elicited by auditory stimuli in dichotic listening.
    Kuriki S; Takeuchi F
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991; 80(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 1716566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y
    Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual categorization of sound spectral envelopes reflected in auditory-evoked N1m.
    Mizuochi T; Yumoto M; Karino S; Itoh K; Yamakawa K; Kaga K
    Neuroreport; 2005 Apr; 16(6):555-8. PubMed ID: 15812306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency characteristics of contralateral sound suppression of 40-Hz auditory steady-state response.
    Kiyokawa H; Kawase T; Oshima H; Maki A; Kobayashi T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 269(3):791-7. PubMed ID: 21826563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of acute nicotine on prepulse inhibition of auditory change-related cortical responses.
    Kodaira M; Tsuruhara A; Motomura E; Tanii H; Inui K; Kakigi R
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 256():27-35. PubMed ID: 23933145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-stage processing of sounds explains behavioral performance variations due to changes in stimulus contrast and selective attention: an MEG study.
    Kauramäki J; Jääskeläinen IP; Hänninen JL; Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Lampinen J; Sams M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46872. PubMed ID: 23071654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of center frequency and bandwidth on the auditory evoked magnetic field.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Matsuoka K
    Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 218(1-2):64-71. PubMed ID: 16797895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The dependence of the auditory evoked N1m decrement on the bandwidth of preceding notch-filtered noise.
    Okamoto H; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Kubo T; Pantev C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Apr; 21(7):1957-61. PubMed ID: 15869488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Involuntary monitoring of sound signals in noise is reflected in the human auditory evoked N1m response.
    Lagemann L; Okamoto H; Teismann H; Pantev C
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31634. PubMed ID: 22389671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of contralateral noise on the 20-Hz auditory steady state response--magnetoencephalography study.
    Usubuchi H; Kawase T; Kanno A; Yahata I; Miyazaki H; Nakasato N; Kawashima R; Katori Y
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99457. PubMed ID: 24915061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sound level-dependent growth of N1m amplitude with low and high-frequency tones.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2009 Apr; 20(6):548-52. PubMed ID: 19319005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to bandwidth variations of bandpass noise.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):47-54. PubMed ID: 15811698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The contribution of high frequencies to human brain activity underlying horizontal localization of natural spatial sounds.
    Leino S; May PJ; Alku P; Liikkanen LA; Tiitinen H
    BMC Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 8():78. PubMed ID: 17897443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to iterated rippled noise.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):256-61. PubMed ID: 15953534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disentangling the effects of phonation and articulation: hemispheric asymmetries in the auditory N1m response of the human brain.
    Tiitinen H; Mäkelä AM; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
    BMC Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 6():62. PubMed ID: 16225699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural interactions within and beyond the critical band elicited by two simultaneously presented narrow band noises: a magnetoencephalographic study.
    Okamoto H; Stracke H; Pantev C
    Neuroscience; 2008 Feb; 151(3):913-20. PubMed ID: 18191899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.