150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34929311)
41. Mechanical and dynamic characteristics of encapsulated microbubbles coupled by magnetic nanoparticles as multifunctional imaging and drug delivery agents.
Guo G; Lu L; Yin L; Tu J; Guo X; Wu J; Xu D; Zhang D
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(22):6729-47. PubMed ID: 25327566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Monodisperse versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: In Vivo Sensitivity and safety in Rat and Pig.
Helbert A; Gaud E; Segers T; Botteron C; Frinking P; Jeannot V
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 46(12):3339-3352. PubMed ID: 33008649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Imaging of angiogenesis using Cadence contrast pulse sequencing and targeted contrast agents.
Stieger SM; Dayton PA; Borden MA; Caskey CF; Griffey SM; Wisner ER; Ferrara KW
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2008; 3(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 18335479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Characterization of individual ultrasound microbubble dynamics with a light-scattering system.
Hsu MJ; Eghtedari M; Goodwin AP; Hall DJ; Mattrey RF; Esener SC
J Biomed Opt; 2011 Jun; 16(6):067002. PubMed ID: 21721823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Neuron labeling with rhodamine-conjugated Gd-based MRI contrast agents delivered to the brain via focused ultrasound.
Morse SV; Boltersdorf T; Harriss BI; Chan TG; Baxan N; Jung HS; Pouliopoulos AN; Choi JJ; Long NJ
Theranostics; 2020; 10(6):2659-2674. PubMed ID: 32194827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Therapeutic Ultrasound Contrast Agents for the Enhancement of Tumor Diagnosis and Tumor Therapy.
Moon H; Yoon C; Lee TW; Ha KS; Chang JH; Song TK; Kim K; Kim H
J Biomed Nanotechnol; 2015 Jul; 11(7):1183-92. PubMed ID: 26307841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Optimizing Sensitivity of Ultrasound Contrast-Enhanced Super-Resolution Imaging by Tailoring Size Distribution of Microbubble Contrast Agent.
Lin F; Tsuruta JK; Rojas JD; Dayton PA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 43(10):2488-2493. PubMed ID: 28668636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Intravascular targets for molecular contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
Moestue SA; Gribbestad IS; Hansen R
Int J Mol Sci; 2012; 13(6):6679-6697. PubMed ID: 22837657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Microbubbles as ultrasound contrast agents for molecular imaging: preparation and application.
Unnikrishnan S; Klibanov AL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):292-9. PubMed ID: 22826389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Superiorly Stable Three-Layer Air Microbubbles Generated by Versatile Ethanol-Water Exchange for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Theranostics.
Deng Q; Mi J; Dong J; Chen Y; Chen L; He J; Zhou J
ACS Nano; 2023 Jan; 17(1):263-274. PubMed ID: 36354372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Quantitative ultrasound molecular imaging by modeling the binding kinetics of targeted contrast agent.
Turco S; Tardy I; Frinking P; Wijkstra H; Mischi M
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2449-2464. PubMed ID: 28240217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Ultrasound-mediated gene delivery with cationic versus neutral microbubbles: effect of DNA and microbubble dose on in vivo transfection efficiency.
Panje CM; Wang DS; Pysz MA; Paulmurugan R; Ren Y; Tranquart F; Tian L; Willmann JK
Theranostics; 2012; 2(11):1078-91. PubMed ID: 23227124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Studies on neutral, cationic and biotinylated cationic microbubbles in enhancing ultrasound-mediated gene delivery in vitro and in vivo.
Nomikou N; Tiwari P; Trehan T; Gulati K; McHale AP
Acta Biomater; 2012 Mar; 8(3):1273-80. PubMed ID: 21958669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effect of Bubble Concentration on the in Vitro and in Vivo Performance of Highly Stable Lipid Shell-Stabilized Micro- and Nanoscale Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
Abenojar EC; Nittayacharn P; de Leon AC; Perera R; Wang Y; Bederman I; Exner AA
Langmuir; 2019 Aug; 35(31):10192-10202. PubMed ID: 30913884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The Role of Microbubble Echo Phase Lag in Multipulse Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.
Tremblay-Darveau C; Sheeran PS; Vu CK; Williams R; Zhang Z; Bruce M; Burns PN
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Aug; 65(8):1389-1401. PubMed ID: 29993575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Imaging with ultrasound contrast agents: current status and future.
Chong WK; Papadopoulou V; Dayton PA
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Apr; 43(4):762-772. PubMed ID: 29508011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Self-assembled microbubbles as contrast agents for ultrasound/magnetic resonance dual-modality imaging.
Song S; Guo H; Jiang Z; Jin Y; Wu Y; An X; Zhang Z; Sun K; Dou H
Acta Biomater; 2015 Sep; 24():266-78. PubMed ID: 26112374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Progress of ultrasound microbubble contrast technology in the diagnosis and treatment of clinical diseases].
Qiu L; Leng QY; Luo Y
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2014 Nov; 45(6):974-8. PubMed ID: 25571727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Nanobubbles for enhanced ultrasound imaging of tumors.
Yin T; Wang P; Zheng R; Zheng B; Cheng D; Zhang X; Shuai X
Int J Nanomedicine; 2012; 7():895-904. PubMed ID: 22393289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Detection of individual microbubbles of ultrasound contrast agents: imaging of free-floating and targeted bubbles.
Klibanov AL; Rasche PT; Hughes MS; Wojdyla JK; Galen KP; Wible JH; Brandenburger GH
Invest Radiol; 2004 Mar; 39(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 15076011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
