BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34930038)

  • 21. Comparison of Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Approach.
    Komolafe TE; Zhang C; Olagbaju OA; Yuan G; Du Q; Li M; Zheng J; Yang X
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 35591290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contrast-Enhanced Cone-Beam Breast CT: An Analysis of Diagnostic Value in Predicting Breast Lesion With Rim Enhancement Malignancy.
    Zhao X; Yang J; Zuo Y; Kang W; Liao H; Zheng ZT; Su DK
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():868975. PubMed ID: 35686106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative breast density measurement based on three-dimensional images: a study on cone-beam breast computed tomography.
    Liu A; Yin L; Ma Y; Han P; Wu Y; Wu Y; Ye Z
    Acta Radiol; 2022 Aug; 63(8):1023-1031. PubMed ID: 34259021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography and head-to-head comparison of digital mammography, magnetic resonance imaging and cone-beam breast computed tomography for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gong W; Zhu J; Hong C; Liu X; Li S; Chen Y; Zhang B; Li X
    Gland Surg; 2023 Oct; 12(10):1360-1374. PubMed ID: 38021193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The utility of breast cone-beam computed tomography, ultrasound, and digital mammography for detecting malignant breast tumors: A prospective study with 212 patients.
    He N; Wu YP; Kong Y; Lv N; Huang ZM; Li S; Wang Y; Geng ZJ; Wu PH; Wei WD
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Feb; 85(2):392-403. PubMed ID: 26781145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nomogram for preoperative differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors using contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE CB-BCT) quantitative imaging and assessment features.
    Su T; Zheng Y; Yang H; Ouyang Z; Fan J; Lin L; Lv F
    Radiol Med; 2024 May; 129(5):737-750. PubMed ID: 38512625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The cone-beam breast computed tomography characteristics of breast non-mass enhancement lesions.
    Kang W; Zhong W; Su D
    Acta Radiol; 2021 Oct; 62(10):1298-1308. PubMed ID: 33070636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Editorial comment: cone-beam and phase contrast CT: new horizons in breast imaging?
    Boss A
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3729-3730. PubMed ID: 29846805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT using laterally-shifted detector geometry: Quantitative analysis of feasibility for clinical translation.
    Vedantham S; Tseng HW; Konate S; Shi L; Karellas A
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(3):405-426. PubMed ID: 32333575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A general method for cupping artifact correction of cone-beam breast computed tomography images.
    Qu X; Lai CJ; Zhong Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1233-46. PubMed ID: 26514684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reference Range of CT Value in NC-CBBCT Based on Female Breast Structure.
    Wei W; Zhong W; Kang W; Zhao X; Yi X; Su D
    Curr Med Imaging; 2023; 19(13):1523-1532. PubMed ID: 36734890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Breast lesion size assessment in mastectomy specimens: Correlation of cone-beam breast-CT, digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with histopathology.
    Wienbeck S; Uhlig J; Fischer U; Hellriegel M; von Fintel E; Kulenkampff D; Surov A; Lotz J; Perske C
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Sep; 98(37):e17082. PubMed ID: 31517829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mammography-based radiomics for predicting the risk of breast cancer recurrence: a multicenter study.
    Mao N; Yin P; Zhang H; Zhang K; Song X; Xing D; Chu T
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Nov; 94(1127):20210348. PubMed ID: 34520235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Retrospective Survival Analysis of Anatomic and Prognostic Stage Group Based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Cancer Staging Manual in Luminal B Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-negative Breast Cancer.
    Xu L; Li JH; Ye JM; Duan XN; Cheng YJ; Xin L; Liu Q; Zhou B; Liu YH
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2017 Aug; 130(16):1945-1952. PubMed ID: 28776547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prognostic impact of (18)FDG-PET-CT findings in clinical stage III and IIB breast cancer.
    Groheux D; Hindié E; Delord M; Giacchetti S; Hamy AS; de Bazelaire C; de Roquancourt A; Vercellino L; Toubert ME; Merlet P; Espié M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Dec; 104(24):1879-87. PubMed ID: 23243198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validation of the Eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer Anatomic and Prognostic Staging System for Breast Cancer.
    Yang PD; Peng QQ; Lian WB; Fu FM; Wang C; Chen D
    J Surg Res; 2022 Feb; 270():539-546. PubMed ID: 34808473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system provide improved prognostic accuracy in T1-2N1M0 postmastectomy breast cancer patients].
    Sun GY; Wang SL; Tang Y; Yang Y; Fang H; Wang JY; Jing H; Zhang JH; Jin J; Song YW; Liu YP; Chen B; Qi SN; Li N; Tang Y; Lu NN; Wang WH; Chen SY; Ren H; Liu XF; Yu ZH; Li YX
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 41(8):615-623. PubMed ID: 31434454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality.
    O'Connell A; Conover DL; Zhang Y; Seifert P; Logan-Young W; Lin CF; Sahler L; Ning R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):496-509. PubMed ID: 20651210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dedicated Cone-beam Breast Computed Tomography and Diagnostic Mammography: Comparison of Radiation Dose, Patient Comfort, And Qualitative Review of Imaging Findings in BI-RADS 4 and 5 Lesions.
    O'Connell AM; Kawakyu-O'Connor D
    J Clin Imaging Sci; 2012; 2():7. PubMed ID: 22439131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimal acquisition time to discriminate between breast cancer subtypes with contrast-enhanced cone-beam CT.
    Chen JT; Zhou CY; He N; Wu YP
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Jun; 101(6):391-399. PubMed ID: 32008993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.