317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34930622)
1. Influence of minimally invasive endodontic access cavities and bonding status of resin composites on the mechanical property of endodontically-treated teeth: A finite element study.
Lin F; Ordinola-Zapata R; Fok ASL; Lee R
Dent Mater; 2022 Feb; 38(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 34930622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of fiber-reinforced direct restorative materials on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored with a conservative endodontic cavity design.
Nezir M; Dinçtürk BA; Sarı C; Alp CK; Altınışık H
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):316. PubMed ID: 38750289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Endodontic Access Cavities on Fracture Resistance of First Maxillary Molar Using the Extended Finite Element Method.
Zhang Y; Liu Y; She Y; Liang Y; Xu F; Fang C
J Endod; 2019 Mar; 45(3):316-321. PubMed ID: 30803539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance and stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PCF; Queiroz EC; Araújo TC; Campos RE; Araújo CA; Soares CJ
J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):114-119. PubMed ID: 17971112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress distribution of bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Martorelli M; Sorrentino R; Gloria A
Am J Dent; 2017 Aug; 30(4):227-232. PubMed ID: 29178706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with combined composite-amalgam restorations.
Geiger S; Paikin L; Gorfil C; Gordon M
Quintessence Int; 2008 Feb; 39(2):e58-62. PubMed ID: 18560642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of cavity-margin-angles and bolus stiffness on the mechanical behavior of indirect resin composite class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Gloria A; Lanzotti A; Maietta S; Martorelli M
Dent Mater; 2017 Jan; 33(1):e39-e47. PubMed ID: 27890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fatigue analysis of restored teeth longitudinally cracked under cyclic loading.
Lin F; Ordinola-Zapata R; Ye N; Xu H; Fok ASL
Dent Mater; 2022 Jan; 38(1):204-213. PubMed ID: 34949478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fatigue Performance and Stress Distribution of Endodontically Treated Premolars Restored with Direct Bulk-fill Resin Composites.
Chen D; Chen Y; Pan Y; Ding H; Chen Q; Meng X
J Adhes Dent; 2021; 23(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 33512117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of two different types of fibers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with composite resin.
Khan SI; Anupama R; Deepalakshmi M; Kumar KS
J Adhes Dent; 2013 Apr; 15(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 23534017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical behavior of maxillary premolars with conservative and traditional endodontic cavities.
Roperto R; Sousa YT; Dias T; Machado R; Perreira RD; Leoni GB; Palma-Dibb RG; Rodrigues MP; Soares CJ; Teich S; Sousa-Neto MD
Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(5):350-356. PubMed ID: 30957110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-year clinical evaluation of nonvital tooth whitening and resin composite restorations.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(6):369-78; discussion 379. PubMed ID: 16417833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
