318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34930622)
21. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mechanical weakening of devitalized teeth: three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis and prediction of tooth fracture.
Zelic K; Vukicevic A; Jovicic G; Aleksandrovic S; Filipovic N; Djuric M
Int Endod J; 2015 Sep; 48(9):850-63. PubMed ID: 25243348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Virtual prototyping of adhesively restored, endodontically treated molars.
Magne P
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):343-51. PubMed ID: 20493323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Finite Element Analysis of the Endodontically-treated Maxillary Premolars restored with Composite Resin along with Glass Fiber Insertion in Various Positions.
Navimipour EJ; Firouzmandi M; Mirhashemi FS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Apr; 16(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 26067731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
Sengun A; Cobankara FK; Orucoglu H
Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically-treated maxillary premolars.
Oskoee SS; Oskoee PA; Navimipour EJ; Shahi S
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):510-4. PubMed ID: 17910229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.
Mohammadi N; Kahnamoii MA; Yeganeh PK; Navimipour EJ
J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of Access Cavities and Canal Enlargement on Biomechanics of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Finite Element Analysis.
Wang Q; Liu Y; Wang Z; Yang T; Liang Y; Gao Z; Fang C; Zhang Y
J Endod; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1501-1507. PubMed ID: 32615176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Effects of Endodontic Access Cavity Preparation Design on the Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Traditional Versus Conservative Preparation.
Özyürek T; Ülker Ö; Demiryürek EÖ; Yılmaz F
J Endod; 2018 May; 44(5):800-805. PubMed ID: 29571907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Direct resin composite restoration of endodontically-treated permanent molars in adolescents: bite force and patient-specific finite element analysis.
Rodrigues MP; Soares PBF; Gomes MAB; Pereira RA; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190544. PubMed ID: 32348440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Marginal integrity in minimally invasive molar resin composite restorations: Impact of polymerization shrinkage.
Weimann D; Fleck C; Razi H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Jul; 155():106554. PubMed ID: 38676971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The influence of dental restoration depth, internal cavity angle, and material properties on biomechanical resistance of a treated molar tooth.
Babaei B; Cella S; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty BG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Sep; 133():105305. PubMed ID: 35700676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Adhesive class I restorations in sound molar teeth incorporating combined resin-composite and glass ionomer materials: CAD-FE modeling and analysis.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Di Rienzo A; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1514-1522. PubMed ID: 31395448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of two types of composite fibers on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars: an in vitro study.
Oskoee PA; Chaharom ME; Kimyai S; Oskoee JS; Varasteh S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan; 12(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 22186687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with Class II composite restorations.
Reel DC; Mitchell RJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Feb; 61(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 2654362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of novel restorative materials and retention slots on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth.
Yasa B; Arslan H; Yasa E; Akcay M; Hatirli H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 25982519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
