These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34930622)

  • 61. Fracture resistance and biomechanical behavior of different access cavities of maxillary central incisors restored with different composite resins.
    Hasna AA; Pinto ABA; Coelho MS; de Andrade GS; Tribst JPM; de Castro Lopes SLP; Carvalho CAT; Borges ALS
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6295-6303. PubMed ID: 35713701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
    Magne P
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Effect of Truss Access and Artificial Truss Restoration on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Mandibular First Molars.
    Abou-Elnaga MY; Alkhawas MAM; Kim HC; Refai AS
    J Endod; 2019 Jun; 45(6):813-817. PubMed ID: 30905571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The three-dimension finite element analysis of stress in posterior tooth residual root restored with postcore crown.
    Fu G; Deng F; Wang L; Ren A
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Feb; 26(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 19843136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Finite element analysis of different restorative materials in primary teeth restorations.
    Sengul F; Gurbuz T; Sengul S
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Sep; 15(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 25306152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Biomechanical Assessment of Restored Mandibular Molar by Endocrown in Comparison to a Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crown: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Helal MA; Wang Z
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):988-996. PubMed ID: 29067737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The new generation of conventional and bulk-fill composites do not reduce the shrinkage stress in endodontically-treated molars.
    Oliveira Schliebe LRS; Lourenço Braga SS; da Silva Pereira RA; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Novais VR; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Am J Dent; 2016 Dec; 29(6):333-338. PubMed ID: 29178721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Strengthening effect of horizontally placed fiberglass posts in endodontically-treated teeth restored with direct resin composite.
    Favero FJ; De Melo TA; Stona D; Mota EG; Spohr AM; Burnett LH
    Am J Dent; 2015 Jun; 28(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 26201225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Teeth Restored with Bulk-Fill Composites and Conventional Resin Composites; Investigation of Stress Distribution and Fracture Lifespan on Enamel, Dentin, and Restorative Materials via Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Gönder HY; Mohammadi R; Harmankaya A; Yüksel İB; Fidancıoğlu YD; Karabekiroğlu S
    Polymers (Basel); 2023 Mar; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 37050251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The influence of elastic modulus mismatch between tooth and post and core restorations on root fracture.
    Ona M; Wakabayashi N; Yamazaki T; Takaichi A; Igarashi Y
    Int Endod J; 2013 Jan; 46(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 22775227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of root-canal treated mandibular molars with intracoronal restorations: effect of thermocycling and mechanical loading.
    Hitz T; Ozcan M; Göhring TN
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Aug; 12(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 20157655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Cumulative effects of successive restorative procedures on anterior crown flexure: intact versus veneered incisors.
    Magne P; Douglas WH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 11203907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Effect of post-retained composite restoration of MOD preparations on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
    Sorrentino R; Salameh Z; Zarone F; Tay FR; Ferrari M
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Feb; 9(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 17432401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
    Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Class II composite restorations: importance of cervical enamel in vitro.
    Laegreid T; Gjerdet NR; Vult von Steyern P; Johansson AK
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 21777100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. [Superficial and internal adaptations of a new self-curing composite resin restored class Ⅴ cavity].
    Zhang C; Yang B; Wang Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 55(3):171-177. PubMed ID: 32193913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Fracture strength of root filled premolar teeth restored with silorane and methacrylate-based resin composite.
    Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Bagheri R; Abu Holy A
    J Dent; 2015 Jun; 43(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 25656772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Effect of resin cements and aging on cuspal deflection and fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resin inlays.
    Salaverry A; Borges GA; Mota EG; Burnett Júnior LH; Spohr AM
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Dec; 15(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 23653900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Influence of adhesive techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with various residual wall thicknesses.
    Scotti N; Rota R; Scansetti M; Paolino DS; Chiandussi G; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 24095213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.