These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34930789)

  • 1. Improving the aseptic transfer procedures in hospital pharmacies part C: evaluation and redesign of the transfer process.
    Boom FA; Le Brun PPH; Boehringer S; Kosterink JGW; Touw DJ
    Eur J Hosp Pharm; 2022 Jan; 29(1):12-17. PubMed ID: 34930789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the aseptic transfer procedures in hospital pharmacies part A: methods for the determination of the surface bioburden on ampoules and vials.
    Boom FA; Le Brun PPH; Boehringer S; Kosterink JGW; Touw D
    Eur J Hosp Pharm; 2021 Jan; 28(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 33355282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microbiological controls of aseptic handling in Dutch hospital pharmacies: Results, limits, and methods for assessing.
    Boom FA; Le Brun PPH; Bühringer S; Sirks M; Touw DJ
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2022 Aug; 175():106228. PubMed ID: 35640785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the aseptic transfer procedures in hospital pharmacies. Part B: evaluation of disinfection methods for materials with a non-sterile surface.
    Boom FA; Le Brun PPH; Boehringer S; Kosterink JGW; Touw D
    Eur J Hosp Pharm; 2021 Sep; 28(5):271-275. PubMed ID: 34426480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing the risk of non-sterility of aseptic handling in hospital pharmacies, part B: risk control.
    Boom FA; Ris JM; Veenbaas T; Le Brun PPH; Touw D
    Eur J Hosp Pharm; 2021 Nov; 28(6):325-330. PubMed ID: 32385068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defining unnecessary disinfection procedures for single-dose and multiple-dose vials.
    Buckley T; Dudley SM; Donowitz LG
    Am J Crit Care; 1994 Nov; 3(6):448-51. PubMed ID: 7834004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of two work practice changes on the microbial contamination rates of pharmacy-compounded sterile preparations.
    Trissel LA; Gentempo JA; Saenz LM; Woodard MY; Angeles CH
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2007 Apr; 64(8):837-41. PubMed ID: 17420200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of ampoules and vials in sterile and conventional packaging as to microbial load and sterility test.
    Freitas RR; Tardelli MA
    Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2016 May; 14(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 27223307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microbiological monitoring during aseptic handling: Methods, limits and interpretation of results.
    Boom FA; Brun PPHL; Bühringer S; Touw DJ
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2020 Dec; 155():105540. PubMed ID: 32898638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental contamination by cyclophosphamide preparation: Comparison of conventional manual production in biological safety cabinet and robot-assisted production by APOTECAchemo.
    Schierl R; Masini C; Groeneveld S; Fischer E; Böhlandt A; Rosini V; Paolucci D
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Feb; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 25227229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of alcohol swabs and filter straws on reducing contamination of glass ampoules used for neuroaxial injections.
    Hemingway CJ; Malhotra S; Almeida M; Azadian B; Yentis SM
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Mar; 62(3):286-8. PubMed ID: 17300308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of alcohol wipes used during aseptic manufacturing.
    Panousi MN; Williams GJ; Girdlestone S; Hiom SJ; Maillard JY
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 May; 48(5):648-51. PubMed ID: 19228287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Development and Implementation of Airflow Visualization Studies ("Smoke" Studies) as a Training Tool in Aseptic Hospital Compounding Facilities.
    Borgonje PE; Wibier L; Noordman P; Woerdenbag HJ; Gareb B
    Pharmacy (Basel); 2022 Aug; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 36136834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety concerns with glass particle contamination: improving the standard guidelines for preparing medication injections.
    Chiannilkulchai N; Kejkornkaew S
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2021 Jun; 33(2):. PubMed ID: 34101800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reducing the risk of non-sterility of aseptic handling in hospital pharmacies, part A: risk assessment.
    Boom FA; Ris JM; Veenbaas T; Le Brun PPH; Touw D
    Eur J Hosp Pharm; 2022 May; 29(3):151-156. PubMed ID: 32385070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is Transducer Hygiene sufficient when Vaginal Probes are used in the Clinical Routine?
    Merz E
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Apr; 37(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 27058433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of background air on microbial contamination during simulated i.v.-admixture preparation.
    van Doorne H; Bakker JH; Meevis RF; Marskamp A
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 1994 Jun; 19(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 7962221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Media-fill simulation tests in manual and robotic aseptic preparation of injection solutions in syringes.
    Krämer I; Federici M; Kaiser V; Thiesen J
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Apr; 22(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 25549919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Natural bioburden levels detected on rigid lumened medical devices before and after cleaning.
    Chan-Myers H; McAlister D; Antonoplos P
    Am J Infect Control; 1997 Dec; 25(6):471-6. PubMed ID: 9437486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of an Automated Robotic Cleaning Device for Compounding Pharmacies.
    Polonini H; Dijkers EC; Ferreira AO; da Silva SL; Araújo PVC; Koulouridas S
    Int J Pharm Compd; 2020; 24(5):426-433. PubMed ID: 32886642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.