173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34931057)
1. Journals adopt AI to spot duplicated images in manuscripts.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2022 Jan; 601(7891):14-15. PubMed ID: 34931057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Researchers have finally created a tool to spot duplicated images across thousands of papers.
Butler D
Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7694):18. PubMed ID: 29493609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Meet this super-spotter of duplicated images in science papers.
Shen H
Nature; 2020 May; 581(7807):132-136. PubMed ID: 32405024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. AI peer reviewers unleashed to ease publishing grind.
Heaven D
Nature; 2018 Nov; 563(7733):609-610. PubMed ID: 30482927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Simple steps to avoid plagiarism and improve scientific writing.
Peeran SW; Ahmed AM; Mugrabi MH; Peeran SA
Libyan J Med; 2013 Jul; 8(1):21825. PubMed ID: 23890709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The 'truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth...'.
Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(6):281-2. PubMed ID: 19041445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct encountered by APAME journals: an online survey.
Looi LM; Wong LX; Koh CC
Malays J Pathol; 2015 Dec; 37(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 26712665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Misconduct policies in high-impact biomedical journals.
Bosch X; Hernández C; Pericas JM; Doti P; Marušić A
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e51928. PubMed ID: 23284820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Research integrity: Journals should be clear on misconduct.
Bosch X
Nature; 2013 May; 497(7447):40. PubMed ID: 23636387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The 'self-plagiarism' oxymoron: can one steal from oneself?
Chrousos GP; Kalantaridou SN; Margioris AN; Gravanis A
Eur J Clin Invest; 2012 Mar; 42(3):231-2. PubMed ID: 22268677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Publication dilemmas.
Hughes G
Emerg Med J; 2007 Sep; 24(9):610. PubMed ID: 17711931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Profits and plagiarism: the case of medical ghostwriting.
Anekwe TD
Bioethics; 2010 Jul; 24(6):267-72. PubMed ID: 19222448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Editorial [the emperor of all academic and cultural maladies in scientific writing: plagiarism and auto-plagiarism].
Zaenker KS
Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets; 2012 Feb; 11(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22309078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Spoof research paper is accepted by 157 journals.
Hawkes N
BMJ; 2013 Oct; 347():f5975. PubMed ID: 24096966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The perils of copy and paste: plagiarism in scientific publishing.
Horrom TA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(8):vii-xii. PubMed ID: 23341321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Plagiarism and other scientific misconducts.
Höffken K; Gabbert H
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 135(3):327-8. PubMed ID: 19125293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How to Act When Research Misconduct Is Not Detected by Software but Revealed by the Author of the Plagiarized Article.
Baydik OD; Gasparyan AY
J Korean Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1508-10. PubMed ID: 27550475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combating plagiarism: a shared responsibility.
Rathod SD
Indian J Med Ethics; 2010; 7(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 20806528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Misconduct is the main cause of life-sciences retractions.
Corbyn Z
Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7418):21. PubMed ID: 23038445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
