These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34931775)

  • 1. CAD/CAM-milled versus conventionally cast secondary crowns fabricated from high noble metal alloy: an in vitro study of retentive force.
    Böse MWH; Etzlinger E; Erdelt K; Schweiger J; Beuer F
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):393-403. PubMed ID: 34931775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wear behavior of different double-crown systems.
    Engels J; Schubert O; Güth JF; Hoffmann M; Jauernig C; Erdelt K; Stimmelmayr M; Beuer F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar; 17(2):503-10. PubMed ID: 22573245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro investigations on retention force behavior of conventional and modern double crown systems.
    Luft V; Pospiech P; Schurig A; Schmitter M
    Dent Mater; 2021 Jan; 37(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 33276956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention Force of Removable Partial Dentures with CAD-CAM-Fabricated Telescopic Crowns.
    Arnold C; Schweyen R; Boeckler A; Hey J
    Materials (Basel); 2020 Jul; 13(14):. PubMed ID: 32698421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retentive force of PEEK secondary crowns on zirconia primary crowns over time.
    Schubert O; Reitmaier J; Schweiger J; Erdelt K; Güth JF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2331-2338. PubMed ID: 30293185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention forces between primary and secondary CAD/CAM manufactured telescopic crowns: an in vitro comparison of common material combinations.
    Schimmel M; Walther M; Al-Haj Husain N; Igarashi K; Wittneben J; Abou-Ayash S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Nov; 25(11):6297-6307. PubMed ID: 33834311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional changes of one-piece frameworks cast from titanium, base metal, or noble metal alloys and supported on telescopic crowns.
    Gebelein M; Richter G; Range U; Reitemeier B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 12616241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro fracture strength and thermal shock resistance of metal-ceramic crowns with cast and machined AuTi frameworks.
    Kellerhoff RK; Fischer J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 17499090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retention force of removable partial dentures with different double crowns.
    Arnold C; Hey J; Setz JM; Boeckler AF; Schweyen R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 May; 22(4):1641-1649. PubMed ID: 29101546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retentive force of telescopic crowns combining fiber-reinforced composite and zirconia.
    Tasaka A; Schwindling FS; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Yamashita S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2022 Apr; 66(2):265-271. PubMed ID: 34349081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol.
    Dahl BE; Rønold HJ; Dahl JE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):400-404. PubMed ID: 27692584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of cast Ti-Ni alloy clasp retention with conventional removable partial denture clasps.
    Kim D; Park C; Yi Y; Cho L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):374-82. PubMed ID: 15116040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations.
    Tan PL; Gratton DG; Diaz-Arnold AM; Holmes DC
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jul; 17(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 18355167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wear of double crown systems: electroplated vs. casted female part.
    Bayer S; Kraus D; Keilig L; Gölz L; Stark H; Enkling N
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2012; 20(3):384-91. PubMed ID: 22858708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal Gap of Milled versus Cast Gold Restorations.
    Johnson R; Verrett R; Haney S; Mansueto M; Challa S
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Jan; 26(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 26845495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of marginal and internal gaps of metal ceramic crowns obtained from conventional impressions and casting techniques with those obtained from digital techniques.
    Rai R; Kumar SA; Prabhu R; Govindan RT; Tanveer FM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 28721994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of retentive forces between telescopic crowns made of poly(ether ether ketone) and type 4 gold alloy.
    Nakamura M; Tanaka A; Tasaka A; Yoshinari M; Takemoto S; Yamashita S
    Dent Mater J; 2021 Jan; 40(1):129-135. PubMed ID: 32863374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective Laser Sintering versus Selective Laser Melting and Computer Aided Design - Computer Aided Manufacturing in Double Crowns Retention.
    Goguta L; Lungeanu D; Negru R; Birdeanu M; Jivanescu A; Sinescu C
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):371-378. PubMed ID: 32981911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.