165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34931909)
1. Solutions to problems of nonexistence of parameter estimates and sparse data bias in Poisson regression.
Joshi A; Geroldinger A; Jiricka L; Senchaudhuri P; Corcoran C; Heinze G
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Feb; 31(2):253-266. PubMed ID: 34931909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Firth's logistic regression with rare events: accurate effect estimates and predictions?
Puhr R; Heinze G; Nold M; Lusa L; Geroldinger A
Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2302-2317. PubMed ID: 28295456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bias in Odds Ratios From Logistic Regression Methods With Sparse Data Sets.
Gosho M; Ohigashi T; Nagashima K; Ito Y; Maruo K
J Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 33(6):265-275. PubMed ID: 34565762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On estimation for accelerated failure time models with small or rare event survival data.
Alam TF; Rahman MS; Bari W
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):169. PubMed ID: 35689190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Information criteria for Firth's penalized partial likelihood approach in Cox regression models.
Nagashima K; Sato Y
Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(21):3422-3436. PubMed ID: 28608396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. To tune or not to tune, a case study of ridge logistic regression in small or sparse datasets.
Šinkovec H; Heinze G; Blagus R; Geroldinger A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 34592945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Solution to Separation and Multicollinearity in Multiple Logistic Regression.
Shen J; Gao S
J Data Sci; 2008 Oct; 6(4):515-531. PubMed ID: 20376286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An investigation of penalization and data augmentation to improve convergence of generalized estimating equations for clustered binary outcomes.
Geroldinger A; Blagus R; Ogden H; Heinze G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):168. PubMed ID: 35681120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shrinkage methods enhanced the accuracy of parameter estimation using Cox models with small number of events.
Lin IF; Chang WP; Liao YN
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 66(7):743-51. PubMed ID: 23566374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bias-reduced and separation-proof conditional logistic regression with small or sparse data sets.
Heinze G; Puhr R
Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):770-7. PubMed ID: 20213709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of Firth-and logF-type penalized methods in risk prediction for small or sparse binary data.
Rahman MS; Sultana M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):33. PubMed ID: 28231767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bring More Data!-A Good Advice? Removing Separation in Logistic Regression by Increasing Sample Size.
Šinkovec H; Geroldinger A; Heinze G
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Nov; 16(23):. PubMed ID: 31766753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Penalization, bias reduction, and default priors in logistic and related categorical and survival regressions.
Greenland S; Mansournia MA
Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(23):3133-43. PubMed ID: 26011599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regression shrinkage methods for clinical prediction models do not guarantee improved performance: Simulation study.
Van Calster B; van Smeden M; De Cock B; Steyerberg EW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Nov; 29(11):3166-3178. PubMed ID: 32401702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decreased Susceptibility of Marginal Odds Ratios to Finite-sample Bias.
Ross RK; Cole SR; Richardson DB
Epidemiology; 2021 Sep; 32(5):648-652. PubMed ID: 34001751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of globally obtained informative priors on bayesian safety performance functions developed for Australian crash data.
Afghari AP; Haque MM; Washington S; Smyth T
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():55-65. PubMed ID: 31108237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Penalized maximum likelihood inference under the mixture cure model in sparse data.
Xu C; Bull SB
Stat Med; 2023 Jun; 42(13):2134-2161. PubMed ID: 36964996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of bias-adjusted generalized estimating equations for sparse binary data in small-sample longitudinal studies.
Gosho M; Ishii R; Noma H; Maruo K
Stat Med; 2023 Jul; 42(15):2711-2727. PubMed ID: 37062288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An assessment of estimation methods for generalized linear mixed models with binary outcomes.
Capanu M; Gönen M; Begg CB
Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(26):4550-66. PubMed ID: 23839712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multilevel modeling of single-case data: A comparison of maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation.
Moeyaert M; Rindskopf D; Onghena P; Van den Noortgate W
Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):760-778. PubMed ID: 28358542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
