These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34931909)

  • 21. A comparison of bias-adjusted generalized estimating equations for sparse binary data in small-sample longitudinal studies.
    Gosho M; Ishii R; Noma H; Maruo K
    Stat Med; 2023 Jul; 42(15):2711-2727. PubMed ID: 37062288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An assessment of estimation methods for generalized linear mixed models with binary outcomes.
    Capanu M; Gönen M; Begg CB
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(26):4550-66. PubMed ID: 23839712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multilevel modeling of single-case data: A comparison of maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation.
    Moeyaert M; Rindskopf D; Onghena P; Van den Noortgate W
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):760-778. PubMed ID: 28358542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Confidence intervals for multinomial logistic regression in sparse data.
    Bull SB; Lewinger JP; Lee SS
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):903-18. PubMed ID: 16489602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Firth's penalized logistic regression: A superior approach for analysis of data from India's National Mental Health Survey, 2016.
    Suhas S; Manjunatha N; Kumar CN; Benegal V; Rao GN; Varghese M; Gururaj G
    Indian J Psychiatry; 2023 Dec; 65(12):1208-1213. PubMed ID: 38298875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating population size: The importance of model and estimator choice.
    Schofield MR; Barker RJ; Link WA; Pavanato H
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3803-3817. PubMed ID: 36654190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adjustment for sparse data bias in odds ratios: Significance to appraisal of risk of diabetes due to occupational trichlorfon insecticide exposure.
    Burstyn I; Miller D
    Glob Epidemiol; 2024 Dec; 8():100154. PubMed ID: 39100964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Re-evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of bootstrap-based optimism correction methods in the development of multivariable clinical prediction models.
    Iba K; Shinozaki T; Maruo K; Noma H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):9. PubMed ID: 33413132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis.
    van Smeden M; de Groot JA; Moons KG; Collins GS; Altman DG; Eijkemans MJ; Reitsma JB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):163. PubMed ID: 27881078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Avoiding infinite estimates of time-dependent effects in small-sample survival studies.
    Heinze G; Dunkler D
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(30):6455-69. PubMed ID: 18816502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Investigating different approaches to develop informative priors in hierarchical Bayesian safety performance functions.
    Yu R; Abdel-Aty M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jul; 56():51-8. PubMed ID: 23612558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sensitivity analyses for sparse-data problems-using weakly informative bayesian priors.
    Hamra GB; MacLehose RF; Cole SR
    Epidemiology; 2013 Mar; 24(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 23337241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Default Priors for the Intercept Parameter in Logistic Regressions.
    Boonstra PS; Barbaro RP; Sen A
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2019 May; 133():245-256. PubMed ID: 31530966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. New ridge parameter estimators for the quasi-Poisson ridge regression model.
    Shahzad A; Amin M; Emam W; Faisal M
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8489. PubMed ID: 38605090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Review and evaluation of penalised regression methods for risk prediction in low-dimensional data with few events.
    Pavlou M; Ambler G; Seaman S; De Iorio M; Omar RZ
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(7):1159-77. PubMed ID: 26514699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. More stable estimation of the STARTS model: A Bayesian approach using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques.
    Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A; Wagner J
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):570-593. PubMed ID: 29172612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of Bayesian spatiotemporal infectious disease models for prospective surveillance analysis.
    Kim J; Lawson AB; Neelon B; Korte JE; Eberth JM; Chowell G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):171. PubMed ID: 37481553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation using penalized quasilikelihood and quasi-pseudo-likelihood in Poisson mixed models.
    Lin X
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2007 Dec; 13(4):533-44. PubMed ID: 18080833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research. II. Regression analysis.
    Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 36(1):195-202. PubMed ID: 17329317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Maximum Entropy Procedure to Solve Likelihood Equations.
    Calcagnì A; Finos L; Altoé G; Pastore M
    Entropy (Basel); 2019 Jun; 21(6):. PubMed ID: 33267310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.