309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34932015)
1. An Analysis of US Academic Medical Center Websites: Usability Study.
Gale JJ; Black KC; Calvano JD; Fundingsland EL; Lai D; Silacci S; He S
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Dec; 23(12):e27750. PubMed ID: 34932015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applying Website Rankings to Digital Health Centers in the United States to Assess Public Engagement: Website Usability Study.
Calvano JD; Fundingsland EL; Lai D; Silacci S; Raja AS; He S
JMIR Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 8(1):e20721. PubMed ID: 33779564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. American Anesthesiology Residency Programs: Website Usability Analysis.
Seto N; Beach J; Calvano J; Lu S; He S
Interact J Med Res; 2022 Oct; 11(2):e38759. PubMed ID: 36264625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Website usability analysis of United States emergency medicine residencies.
Fundingsland E; Fike J; Calvano J; Raja A; Lai D; Silacci S; Haas M; Chan T; He S
AEM Educ Train; 2021 Jul; 5(3):e10604. PubMed ID: 34124531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Website Usability Analysis of U.S. Military Residency Programs.
Chong P; Grob P; DiMattia G; Calvano J; Swanson K; He S; Gubler KD; LaPorta A
Mil Med; 2022 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 36200474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analyzing opioid-use disorder websites in the United States: An optimized website usability study.
He S; Shyamsundar S; Chong P; Kannikal J; Calvano J; Balapal N; Kallenberg N; Balaji A; Ankem A; Martin A
Digit Health; 2022; 8():20552076221121529. PubMed ID: 36225987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the quality and readability of online information about breast cancer in China.
Li Y; Zhou X; Zhou Y; Mao F; Shen S; Lin Y; Zhang X; Chang TH; Sun Q
Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Apr; 104(4):858-864. PubMed ID: 32988687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility.
Mac OA; Thayre A; Tan S; Dodd RH
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e16701. PubMed ID: 32442134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methodological Guidelines for Systematic Assessments of Health Care Websites Using Web Analytics: Tutorial.
Fundingsland EL; Fike J; Calvano J; Beach J; Lai D; He S
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Apr; 24(4):e28291. PubMed ID: 35436216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Readability, content, and quality of COVID-19 patient education materials from academic medical centers in the United States.
Kruse J; Toledo P; Belton TB; Testani EJ; Evans CT; Grobman WA; Miller ES; Lange EMS
Am J Infect Control; 2021 Jun; 49(6):690-693. PubMed ID: 33259825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Will the Effect of New Federal Breast Density Legislation Be Diminished by Currently Available Online Patient Educational Materials?
Miles RC; Choi P; Baird GL; Dibble EH; Lamb L; Garg M; Lehman C
Acad Radiol; 2020 Oct; 27(10):1400-1405. PubMed ID: 31839567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. US Medical Information Websites Benchmarking: How Is the Industry Fairing in Usability?
Paquette-Lemieux E; Hays S; Gaspo R
Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2019 May; 53(3):340-348. PubMed ID: 29976102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interactivity, Quality, and Content of Websites Promoting Health Behaviors During Infancy: 6-Year Update of the Systematic Assessment.
Jawad D; Cheng H; Wen LM; Rissel C; Baur L; Mihrshahi S; Taki S
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Oct; 24(10):e38641. PubMed ID: 36206031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Empowerment of Parents of Children With Craniosynostosis by Objective Scoring of Patient Information Websites.
Lloyd MS; Lafferty K; Horton J; Noons P; Dover S; Evans M
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 27(4):874-5. PubMed ID: 27192636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Brain death and the internet: evaluating the readability and quality of online health information.
Guven Kose S; Kose HC; Erbakan M; Tulgar S
Minerva Anestesiol; 2022 Sep; 88(9):698-705. PubMed ID: 35199972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
