205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34932191)
1. Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers.
Kaiser M; Drivdal L; Hjellbrekke J; Ingierd H; Rekdal OB
Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Dec; 28(1):2. PubMed ID: 34932191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevalence of Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Xie Y; Wang K; Kong Y
Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Jun; 27(4):41. PubMed ID: 34189653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of Research.
Ravn T; Sørensen MP
Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Jun; 27(4):40. PubMed ID: 34136962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands.
Gopalakrishna G; Ter Riet G; Vink G; Stoop I; Wicherts JM; Bouter LM
PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263023. PubMed ID: 35171921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity.
Bouter L
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Aug; 26(4):2363-2369. PubMed ID: 31965429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists' Engagement in Questionable Research Practices.
Sacco DF; Bruton SV; Brown M
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 29179623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers' Perceptions in Spain.
Feenstra RA; Delgado López-Cózar E; Pallarés-Domínguez D
Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Jan; 27(1):1. PubMed ID: 33492516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Defining and Handling Research Misconduct: A Comparison Between Chinese and European Institutional Policies.
Li D; Cornelis G
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):302-319. PubMed ID: 32613889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Criminalization of scientific misconduct.
Bülow W; Helgesson G
Med Health Care Philos; 2019 Jun; 22(2):245-252. PubMed ID: 30155851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How do researchers perceive research misbehaviors? A case study of Indian researchers.
Palla IA; Singson M
Account Res; 2023 Dec; 30(8):707-724. PubMed ID: 35584318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Questionable research practices in student final theses - Prevalence, attitudes, and the role of the supervisor's perceived attitudes.
Krishna A; Peter SM
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0203470. PubMed ID: 30161249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Associations between attitudes towards scientific misconduct and self-reported behavior.
Holm S; Hofmann B
Account Res; 2018; 25(5):290-300. PubMed ID: 29874932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific misconduct and associated factors: A survey of researchers in three Chinese tertiary hospitals.
Yu L; Miao M; Liu W; Zhang B; Zhang P
Account Res; 2021 Feb; 28(2):95-114. PubMed ID: 32783533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Research integrity among PhD students within clinical research at the University of Southern Denmark.
Jensen LB; Kyvik KO; Leth-Larsen R; Eriksen MB
Dan Med J; 2018 Apr; 65(4):. PubMed ID: 29619924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities.
Godecharle S; Fieuws S; Nemery B; Dierickx K
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1697-1717. PubMed ID: 28971354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.
Okonta P; Rossouw T
Dev World Bioeth; 2013 Dec; 13(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 22994914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China.
Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jun; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 32487190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010.
Liao QJ; Zhang YY; Fan YC; Zheng MH; Bai Y; Eslick GD; He XX; Zhang SB; Xia HH; He H
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):629-645. PubMed ID: 28397174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018.
Dal-Ré R; Ayuso C
J Med Genet; 2019 Nov; 56(11):734-740. PubMed ID: 31300549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe.
Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
Account Res; 2019 Oct; 26(7):405-426. PubMed ID: 31379202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
