These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34932690)

  • 21. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
    Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Craniofacial anthropometric norms of Malays.
    Ngeow WC; Aljunid ST
    Singapore Med J; 2009 May; 50(5):525-8. PubMed ID: 19495526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tooth-borne versus tooth-bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders according to a stereophotogrammetric evaluation of facial soft tissues: A randomized clinical trial.
    Akan B; Gökçe G; Şahan AO; Veli İ
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Aug; 24(3):438-448. PubMed ID: 34105880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Morphological Changes in Faces Depending on Posture.
    Nishioka H; Hishikawa M; Nagai F; Yuzuriha S
    Facial Plast Surg; 2022 Apr; 38(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 34062567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The relationship between facial morphology and the structure of the alveolar part of the mandible in edentulous complete denture wearers. A preliminary study.
    Kuć J; Sierpińska T; Gołębiewska M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Jan; 73(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 25183253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Changes in facial profile of young adults with normal occlusion: a longitudinal study.
    Tibana RH; Palagi LM; Carneiro MS; Almeida MA; Miguel JA
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18575305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry: Comparison of the 3dMD and Bellus3D facial scanning systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
    Liu J; Zhang C; Cai R; Yao Y; Zhao Z; Liao W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Dec; 160(6):862-871. PubMed ID: 34814981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of facial soft tissue changes after treatment with 3 different functional appliances.
    Güler ÖÇ; Malkoç S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Oct; 158(4):518-526. PubMed ID: 32988567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 3D stereophotogrammetry quantitative lip analysis.
    Sawyer AR; See M; Nduka C
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Jul; 33(4):497-504. PubMed ID: 18584237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of Different Head Positioning Methods on Facial Soft Tissue Analysis Using Stereophotogrammetry.
    Gül Amuk N; Topsakal KG; Baser Keklikci H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 77(6):1277.e1-1277.e10. PubMed ID: 30880131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three-dimensional quantitative evaluation of facial morphology in adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate, and patients without clefts.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Asi SM; Ismail NH; Rahman ZA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 52(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 24342372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Older adults' facial characteristics compared to young adults' in correlation with edentulism: a cross sectional study.
    Skomina Z; Kočevar D; Verdenik M; Hren NI
    BMC Geriatr; 2022 Jun; 22(1):503. PubMed ID: 35701747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Soft tissue outcome after mandibular advancement--an anthropometric evaluation of 171 consecutive patients.
    Raschke GF; Rieger UM; Bader RD; Guentsch A; Schaefer O; Schultze-Mosgau S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1415-23. PubMed ID: 22893037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
    Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Facial Anthropometric Evaluation of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Infancy Through Adolescence.
    Dehghani M; Jahanbin A; Omidkhoda M; Entezari M; Shadkam E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 29(2):353-357. PubMed ID: 29194260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 3D soft-tissue evaluation of a Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expander and face mask in pre-pubertal phase-A retrospective cohort study.
    Krneta Đokić B; Zhurov A; Richmond S; Verdenik I; Ovsenik M
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Aug; 23(3):323-331. PubMed ID: 32163667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantitative analysis of facial symmetry by using three-dimensional technology.
    Wu Z; Gao X; Long H; Lai W
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jul; 22(1):277. PubMed ID: 35799192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Wearing complete dental prostheses - Effects on perioral morphology.
    Raschke GF; Eberl P; Thompson GA; Güntsch A; Peisker A; Schultze-Mosgau S; Gomez-Dammeier M; Djedovic G; Rieger UM; Beuer F
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2016 Jul; 21(4):e413-9. PubMed ID: 27031069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Three-Dimensional Facial Anthropometric Analysis With and Without Landmark Labelling: Is There a Real Difference?
    Gibelli D; Cappella A; Bertozzi F; Sala D; Sitta S; Tasso DR; Tomasi F; Dolci C; Sforza C
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Mar-Apr 01; 33(2):665-668. PubMed ID: 33867510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.