These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34933279)

  • 1. Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study.
    Han JH; Kim HG; Ahn EM; Park S; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Kwak MS; Jung Y; Shin JE; Shin HD; Cho YS
    Gut Liver; 2022 Sep; 16(5):716-725. PubMed ID: 34933279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate.
    Aniwan S; Orkoonsawat P; Viriyautsahakul V; Angsuwatcharakon P; Pittayanon R; Wisedopas N; Sumdin S; Ponuthai Y; Wiangngoen S; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 111(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 26809333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Zhao S; Wang S; Pan P; Xia T; Chang X; Yang X; Guo L; Meng Q; Yang F; Qian W; Xu Z; Wang Y; Wang Z; Gu L; Wang R; Jia F; Yao J; Li Z; Bai Y
    Gastroenterology; 2019 May; 156(6):1661-1674.e11. PubMed ID: 30738046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Endoscopic" adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator of colonoscopy: First report from the J-SCOUT study.
    Kawamura T; Sekiguchi M; Takamaru H; Mizuguchi Y; Horiguchi G; Kato M; Kobayashi K; Sada M; Oda Y; Yokoyama A; Utsumi T; Tsuji Y; Ohki D; Takeuchi Y; Shichijo S; Ikematsu H; Matsuda K; Teramukai S; Kobayashi N; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Tanaka K
    Dig Endosc; 2023 Jul; 35(5):615-624. PubMed ID: 36434769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of adenomas per colonoscopy and adenomas per positive participant as new quality parameters in screening colonoscopy.
    Gessl I; Waldmann E; Penz D; Majcher B; Dokladanska A; Hinterberger A; Szymanska A; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 30138613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
    Shaukat A; Shamsi N; Menk J; Church TR; Rank J; Colton JB
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2034-2041. PubMed ID: 30312788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.
    van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bossuyt PMM; Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; van der Vlugt M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Aug; 7(8):747-754. PubMed ID: 35550250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
    Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of computer-aided colonoscopy on adenoma miss rates and polyp detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shah S; Park N; Chehade NEH; Chahine A; Monachese M; Tiritilli A; Moosvi Z; Ortizo R; Samarasena J
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Feb; 38(2):162-176. PubMed ID: 36350048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lower Adenoma Miss Rate of Computer-Aided Detection-Assisted Colonoscopy vs Routine White-Light Colonoscopy in a Prospective Tandem Study.
    Wang P; Liu P; Glissen Brown JR; Berzin TM; Zhou G; Lei S; Liu X; Li L; Xiao X
    Gastroenterology; 2020 Oct; 159(4):1252-1261.e5. PubMed ID: 32562721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.
    IJspeert JE; van Doorn SC; van der Brug YM; Bastiaansen BA; Fockens P; Dekker E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 25935704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of Endoscopists' Personality Traits on Adenoma and Polyp Detection Rates in Colonoscopy: A KASID Multicenter Study.
    Jung Y; Cha JM; Lee NH; Joo YE; Lee YJ; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Shin JE; Yang HJ; Lee J; Kim KO; Kim JW; Na SY; Boo SJ; Kim JH; Han MJ; Hwangbo Y; Huh KC
    Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Aug; 65(8):2302-2310. PubMed ID: 32157497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total underwater colonoscopy versus standard CO
    Anderson JC; Kahi CJ; Sullivan A; MacPhail M; Garcia J; Rex DK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):591-598. PubMed ID: 30367879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adenoma miss rates associated with a 3-minute versus 6-minute colonoscopy withdrawal time: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Kumar S; Thosani N; Ladabaum U; Friedland S; Chen AM; Kochar R; Banerjee S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 27931951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Usefulness of mean number of adenomas per positive screenee for identifying meticulous endoscopists among those who achieve acceptable adenoma detection rates.
    Aniwan S; Vanduangden K; Kerr SJ; Wisedopas N; Kongtab N; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
    Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 32544957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk for Interval Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Screening : A Population-Based Cohort Study.
    Wisse PHA; Erler NS; de Boer SY; den Hartog B; Oudkerk Pool M; Terhaar Sive Droste JS; Verveer C; Meijer GA; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Spaander MCW
    Ann Intern Med; 2022 Oct; 175(10):1366-1373. PubMed ID: 36162114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between adenoma detection rate and novel quality indicators for screening colonoscopy. A proposal for quality measures tool kit.
    Abdelfatah MM; Elhanafi S; Zuckerman MJ; Othman MO
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):1148-1157. PubMed ID: 28643529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.
    Vojtechova G; Ngo O; Grega T; Kmochova K; Voska M; Buckova B; Majek O; Zavoral M; Suchanek S
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 32543806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.