235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34933279)
1. Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study.
Han JH; Kim HG; Ahn EM; Park S; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Kwak MS; Jung Y; Shin JE; Shin HD; Cho YS
Gut Liver; 2022 Sep; 16(5):716-725. PubMed ID: 34933279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate.
Aniwan S; Orkoonsawat P; Viriyautsahakul V; Angsuwatcharakon P; Pittayanon R; Wisedopas N; Sumdin S; Ponuthai Y; Wiangngoen S; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 111(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 26809333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Zhao S; Wang S; Pan P; Xia T; Chang X; Yang X; Guo L; Meng Q; Yang F; Qian W; Xu Z; Wang Y; Wang Z; Gu L; Wang R; Jia F; Yao J; Li Z; Bai Y
Gastroenterology; 2019 May; 156(6):1661-1674.e11. PubMed ID: 30738046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "Endoscopic" adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator of colonoscopy: First report from the J-SCOUT study.
Kawamura T; Sekiguchi M; Takamaru H; Mizuguchi Y; Horiguchi G; Kato M; Kobayashi K; Sada M; Oda Y; Yokoyama A; Utsumi T; Tsuji Y; Ohki D; Takeuchi Y; Shichijo S; Ikematsu H; Matsuda K; Teramukai S; Kobayashi N; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Tanaka K
Dig Endosc; 2023 Jul; 35(5):615-624. PubMed ID: 36434769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of adenomas per colonoscopy and adenomas per positive participant as new quality parameters in screening colonoscopy.
Gessl I; Waldmann E; Penz D; Majcher B; Dokladanska A; Hinterberger A; Szymanska A; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 30138613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
Shaukat A; Shamsi N; Menk J; Church TR; Rank J; Colton JB
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2034-2041. PubMed ID: 30312788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.
van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bossuyt PMM; Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; van der Vlugt M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Aug; 7(8):747-754. PubMed ID: 35550250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of computer-aided colonoscopy on adenoma miss rates and polyp detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shah S; Park N; Chehade NEH; Chahine A; Monachese M; Tiritilli A; Moosvi Z; Ortizo R; Samarasena J
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Feb; 38(2):162-176. PubMed ID: 36350048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lower Adenoma Miss Rate of Computer-Aided Detection-Assisted Colonoscopy vs Routine White-Light Colonoscopy in a Prospective Tandem Study.
Wang P; Liu P; Glissen Brown JR; Berzin TM; Zhou G; Lei S; Liu X; Li L; Xiao X
Gastroenterology; 2020 Oct; 159(4):1252-1261.e5. PubMed ID: 32562721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.
IJspeert JE; van Doorn SC; van der Brug YM; Bastiaansen BA; Fockens P; Dekker E
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 25935704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Endoscopists' Personality Traits on Adenoma and Polyp Detection Rates in Colonoscopy: A KASID Multicenter Study.
Jung Y; Cha JM; Lee NH; Joo YE; Lee YJ; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Shin JE; Yang HJ; Lee J; Kim KO; Kim JW; Na SY; Boo SJ; Kim JH; Han MJ; Hwangbo Y; Huh KC
Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Aug; 65(8):2302-2310. PubMed ID: 32157497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total underwater colonoscopy versus standard CO
Anderson JC; Kahi CJ; Sullivan A; MacPhail M; Garcia J; Rex DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):591-598. PubMed ID: 30367879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adenoma miss rates associated with a 3-minute versus 6-minute colonoscopy withdrawal time: a prospective, randomized trial.
Kumar S; Thosani N; Ladabaum U; Friedland S; Chen AM; Kochar R; Banerjee S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 27931951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness of mean number of adenomas per positive screenee for identifying meticulous endoscopists among those who achieve acceptable adenoma detection rates.
Aniwan S; Vanduangden K; Kerr SJ; Wisedopas N; Kongtab N; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 32544957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk for Interval Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Screening : A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Wisse PHA; Erler NS; de Boer SY; den Hartog B; Oudkerk Pool M; Terhaar Sive Droste JS; Verveer C; Meijer GA; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Spaander MCW
Ann Intern Med; 2022 Oct; 175(10):1366-1373. PubMed ID: 36162114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between adenoma detection rate and novel quality indicators for screening colonoscopy. A proposal for quality measures tool kit.
Abdelfatah MM; Elhanafi S; Zuckerman MJ; Othman MO
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):1148-1157. PubMed ID: 28643529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.
Vojtechova G; Ngo O; Grega T; Kmochova K; Voska M; Buckova B; Majek O; Zavoral M; Suchanek S
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 32543806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
