121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34933523)
1. Diagnostic assessment program for prostate cancer: Lessons learned after 2 years and degree of compliance to Canadian guidelines.
Shabana W; Kotb A; Tesolin D; Ibrahim MFK; Dolcetti K; Boucher A; Bassuony M; Ramchandar K; Zakaria AS; Elmansy H; Shahrour W
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2021 Dec; 93(4):389-392. PubMed ID: 34933523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Diagnostic problems and prognostic factors in prostate cancer].
Tarján M
Magy Onkol; 2016 Mar; 60(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 26934354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of localised prostate cancer: watchful waiting, surgery or radiation therapy, depending on the natural course, which is often relatively slow.
Prescrire Int; 2012 Oct; 21(131):242-8. PubMed ID: 23185849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between percent positive biopsies and biochemical outcome after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for clinically organ-confined carcinoma of the prostate gland.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Galbreath RW; Lief JH; Adamovich E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(3):664-73. PubMed ID: 11849788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial: VA/NCI/AHRQ Cooperative Studies Program #407 (PIVOT): design and baseline results of a randomized controlled trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting for men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Wilt TJ
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2012 Dec; 2012(45):184-90. PubMed ID: 23271771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment options for localized prostate cancer.
Keyes M; Crook J; Morton G; Vigneault E; Usmani N; Morris WJ
Can Fam Physician; 2013 Dec; 59(12):1269-74. PubMed ID: 24336537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimizing patient selection for prostate monotherapy.
Lee AK; Schultz D; Renshaw AA; Richie JP; D'Amico AV
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Mar; 49(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 11172948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical utility of percent prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer cutpoints to risk stratify patients before radical prostatectomy.
Freedland SJ; Csathy GS; Dorey F; Aronson WJ
Urology; 2002 Jul; 60(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 12100929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Wilt TJ; MacDonald R; Rutks I; Shamliyan TA; Taylor BC; Kane RL
Ann Intern Med; 2008 Mar; 148(6):435-48. PubMed ID: 18252677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Does the delay from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy influence the risk of biochemical recurrence?].
Meunier ME; Neuzillet Y; Radulescu C; Cherbonnier C; Hervé JM; Rouanne M; Molinié V; Lebret T
Prog Urol; 2018 Sep; 28(10):475-481. PubMed ID: 29907495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of external beam radiation therapy versus radical prostatectomy for patients with low risk prostate carcinoma diagnosed, staged, and treated at a single institution.
Martinez AA; Gonzalez JA; Chung AK; Kestin LL; Balasubramaniam M; Diokno AC; Ziaja EL; Brabbins DS; Vicini FA
Cancer; 2000 Jan; 88(2):425-32. PubMed ID: 10640977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Prostate cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial:VA/NCI/AHRQ Cooperative Studies Program #407 (PIVOT): design and baseline results of a randomized controlled trial comparing radical prostatectomy to watchful waiting for men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Wilt TJ; Brawer MK; Barry MJ; Jones KM; Kwon Y; Gingrich JR; Aronson WJ; Nsouli I; Iyer P; Cartagena R; Snider G; Roehrborn C; Fox S
Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Jan; 30(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 18783735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features.
Vargas C; Kestin LL; Weed DW; Krauss D; Vicini FA; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):714-24. PubMed ID: 15708249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early detection of prostate cancer with low PSA cut-off values leads to significant stage migration in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Berger AP; Spranger R; Kofler K; Steiner H; Bartsch G; Horninger W
Prostate; 2003 Oct; 57(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 12949932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with USPSTF screening recommendations at a community-based urology practice.
Gaylis FD; Choi JE; Hamilton Z; Dato P; Cohen E; Calabrese R; Prime H; Rosenbaum A; Kader AK
Urol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):663.e1-663.e7. PubMed ID: 28736250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conservative management of prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era: the incidence and time course of subsequent therapy.
Zietman AL; Thakral H; Wilson L; Schellhammer P
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1702-6. PubMed ID: 11586206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
