301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34933762)
1. Black race associated with lower live birth rate in frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles: an analysis of 7,002 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles.
Makhijani R; Godiwala P; Grady J; Christy A; Thornton K; Grow D; Engmann L
Fertil Steril; 2022 Feb; 117(2):360-367. PubMed ID: 34933762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Antimüllerian hormone as a predictor of live birth following assisted reproduction: an analysis of 85,062 fresh and thawed cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012-2013.
Tal R; Seifer DB; Wantman E; Baker V; Tal O
Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 29331235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential impact of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on live birth rate in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System study.
Gerber RS; Fazzari M; Kappy M; Cohen A; Galperin S; Lieman H; Jindal S; Buyuk E
Fertil Steril; 2020 Dec; 114(6):1225-1231. PubMed ID: 33012553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient and cycle characteristics predicting high pregnancy rates with single-embryo transfer: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology outcomes between 2004 and 2013.
Mersereau J; Stanhiser J; Coddington C; Jones T; Luke B; Brown MB
Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):750-756. PubMed ID: 28923285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of pre-pregnancy body mass index on neonatal outcomes in women undergoing autologous frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
Yang X; Zheng B; Wang Y
Fertil Steril; 2021 Oct; 116(4):1010-1019. PubMed ID: 33926721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does a frozen embryo transfer ameliorate the effect of elevated progesterone seen in fresh transfer cycles?
Healy MW; Patounakis G; Connell MT; Devine K; DeCherney AH; Levy MJ; Hill MJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jan; 105(1):93-9.e1. PubMed ID: 26453267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Delayed blastulation, multinucleation, and expansion grade are independently associated with live-birth rates in frozen blastocyst transfer cycles.
Desai N; Ploskonka S; Goodman L; Attaran M; Goldberg JM; Austin C; Falcone T
Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1370-1378. PubMed ID: 27565255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interpregnancy interval and singleton pregnancy outcomes after frozen embryo transfer.
Quinn MM; Rosen MP; Allen IE; Huddleston HG; Cedars MI; Fujimoto VY
Fertil Steril; 2019 Jun; 111(6):1145-1150. PubMed ID: 30955846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neutral effect of body mass index on implantation rate after frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer.
Insogna IG; Lee MS; Reimers RM; Toth TL
Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):770-776.e1. PubMed ID: 28985909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endometrial thickness is not predictive for live birth after embryo transfer, even without a cutoff.
Shakerian B; Turkgeldi E; Yildiz S; Keles I; Ata B
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jul; 116(1):130-137. PubMed ID: 33812651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of live-birth defects after luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles.
Chen H; Wang Y; Lyu Q; Ai A; Fu Y; Tian H; Cai R; Hong Q; Chen Q; Shoham Z; Kuang Y
Fertil Steril; 2015 May; 103(5):1194-1201.e2. PubMed ID: 25813280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes after either fresh or thawed frozen embryo transfer: an analysis of 112,432 singleton pregnancies recorded in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority anonymized dataset.
Maheshwari A; Raja EA; Bhattacharya S
Fertil Steril; 2016 Dec; 106(7):1703-1708. PubMed ID: 27678031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in blastocyst-stage biopsy with frozen embryo transfer and cleavage-stage biopsy with fresh embryo transfer after preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening.
Jing S; Luo K; He H; Lu C; Zhang S; Tan Y; Gong F; Lu G; Lin G
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):105-112.e4. PubMed ID: 27005274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fresh embryo transfer after in vitro insemination of fresh vs. cryopreserved anonymous donor oocytes: which has a better live birth rate? A Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System analysis.
Whynott RM; Summers KM; Ball GD; Van Voorhis BJ; Sparks A
Fertil Steril; 2022 Apr; 117(4):803-810. PubMed ID: 35216830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of birth weights in patients randomly assigned to fresh or frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Bedient CE; Garner FC
Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):317-21. PubMed ID: 27397626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012.
Styer AK; Luke B; Vitek W; Christianson MS; Baker VL; Christy AY; Polotsky AJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 26997248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy and safety of frozen-thawed embryo transfer in women aged 35 to 42 years from the PURSUE randomized clinical trial.
Boostanfar R; Gates D; Guan Y; Gordon K; McCrary Sisk C; Stegmann BJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):300-305.e5. PubMed ID: 27090863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fresh versus frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in high responders.
Kalem Z; Namli Kalem M; Ruso H; Bakirarar B; Gurgan T
Ginekol Pol; 2018; 89(8):407-413. PubMed ID: 30215458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of transferring embryos that show no evidence of fertilization at the time of fertilization assessment.
Li M; Lin S; Chen Y; Zhu J; Liu P; Qiao J
Fertil Steril; 2015 Sep; 104(3):607-11.e2. PubMed ID: 26049055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
