167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34934575)
1. Retrospective Analysis and Comparison of 48 Intracranial Meningioma Cases As Two Groups According to Their Size.
Gündüz HB; Esen Aydın A; Karataş Okumuş SY; Çevik OM; Sofuoğlu ÖE; Uysal ML; Asiltürk M; Güneş M; Ovalıoğlu TC; Emel E
Cureus; 2021 Nov; 13(11):e19709. PubMed ID: 34934575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgery on giant meningiomas in very old patients entails frequent postoperative intracranial hemorrhages and atypical histopathology.
Haeren RHL; Rautalin I; Schwartz C; Korja M; Niemelä M
J Neurooncol; 2021 Mar; 152(1):195-204. PubMed ID: 33475932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tumor recurrence in parasagittal and falcine atypical meningiomas invading the superior sagittal sinus.
Cucu AI; Turliuc MD; Costea CF; Dascălu CG; Dumitrescu GF; Sava A; Turliuc Ş; Scripcariu DV; Poeată I
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2020; 61(2):385-395. PubMed ID: 33544790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Relevance of Simpson's grading system for resections in WHO grade I meningiomas].
Otero A; Tabernero MD; Muñoz MC; Sousa P; Miranda D; Pascual D; Gonçalves JM; Ruiz L
Neurocirugia (Astur); 2017; 28(4):176-182. PubMed ID: 28242156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relevance of Simpson grading system and recurrence-free survival after surgery for World Health Organization Grade I meningioma.
Nanda A; Bir SC; Maiti TK; Konar SK; Missios S; Guthikonda B
J Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 126(1):201-211. PubMed ID: 27058201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical Management of Giant Intracranial Meningiomas.
Yaşar S; Kırık A
Eurasian J Med; 2021 Jun; 53(2):73-78. PubMed ID: 34177286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Falx meningiomas: surgical results and lessons learned from 68 cases.
Chung SB; Kim CY; Park CK; Kim DG; Jung HW
J Korean Neurosurg Soc; 2007 Oct; 42(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 19096556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-Staged Approach for Giant Hypervascular Meningioma Resection.
Ansari A; Riyaz S
Asian J Neurosurg; 2020; 15(2):349-353. PubMed ID: 32656131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical treatment of parasagittal and falx meningiomas.
Nowak A; Marchel A
Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2007; 41(4):306-14. PubMed ID: 17874338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical management of giant sphenoid wing meningiomas encasing major cerebral arteries.
Champagne PO; Lemoine E; Bojanowski MW
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Apr; 44(4):E12. PubMed ID: 29606042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multimodal treatment of parasagittal meningiomas: a single-center experience.
Gatterbauer B; Gevsek S; Höftberger R; Lütgendorf-Caucig C; Ertl A; Mallouhi A; Kitz K; Knosp E; Frischer JM
J Neurosurg; 2017 Dec; 127(6):1249-1256. PubMed ID: 28156245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A radiopathological classification of dural tail sign of meningiomas.
Qi ST; Liu Y; Pan J; Chotai S; Fang LX
J Neurosurg; 2012 Oct; 117(4):645-53. PubMed ID: 22839654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lessons from surgical outcome for intracranial meningioma involving major venous sinus.
Han MS; Kim YJ; Moon KS; Lee KH; Yang JI; Kang WD; Lim SH; Jang WY; Jung TY; Kim IY; Jung S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Aug; 95(35):e4705. PubMed ID: 27583904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relevance of Simpson Grade I and II resection in modern neurosurgical treatment of World Health Organization Grade I meningiomas.
Sughrue ME; Kane AJ; Shangari G; Rutkowski MJ; McDermott MW; Berger MS; Parsa AT
J Neurosurg; 2010 Nov; 113(5):1029-35. PubMed ID: 20380529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Convexity meningiomas: study of recurrence factors with special emphasis on the cleavage plane in a series of 100 consecutive patients.
Alvernia JE; Dang ND; Sindou MP
J Neurosurg; 2011 Sep; 115(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 21663413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical features and surgical management of intracranial meningiomas in the elderly.
Yamamoto J; Takahashi M; Idei M; Nakano Y; Soejima Y; Akiba D; Kitagawa T; Ueta K; Miyaoka R; Nishizawa S
Oncol Lett; 2017 Jul; 14(1):909-917. PubMed ID: 28693251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Simpson grading revisited: aggressive surgery and its place in modern meningioma management.
Gousias K; Schramm J; Simon M
J Neurosurg; 2016 Sep; 125(3):551-60. PubMed ID: 26824369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive surgical treatment of intracranial meningiomas in elderly patients (≥ 65 years): outcomes, readmissions, and tumor control.
Thakur JD; Mallari RJ; Corlin A; Yawitz S; Huang W; Eisenberg A; Sivakumar W; Krauss HR; Griffiths C; Barkhoudarian G; Kelly DF
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Oct; 49(4):E17. PubMed ID: 33002879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Re-Evaluating Simpson Grade I, II, and III Resections in Neurosurgical Treatment of World Health Organization Grade I Meningiomas.
Otero-Rodriguez A; Tabernero MD; Munoz-Martin MC; Sousa P; Orfao A; Pascual-Argente D; Gonzalez-Tablas M; Ruiz-Martin L
World Neurosurg; 2016 Dec; 96():483-488. PubMed ID: 27637164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the Simpson Grading System Applicable to Estimate the Risk of Tumor Progression After Microsurgery for Recurrent Intracranial Meningioma?
Schipmann S; Schwake M; Sporns PB; Voß KM; Sicking J; Spille DC; Hess K; Paulus W; Stummer W; Brokinkel B
World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e589-e597. PubMed ID: 30081236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
