131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34935558)
1. The true meaning of DICE: don't ignore chance effects.
Clarke M
J R Soc Med; 2021 Dec; 114(12):575-577. PubMed ID: 34935558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of re-randomized data in meta-analysis.
Hozo I; Djulbegovic B; Clark O; Lyman GH
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 May; 5():17. PubMed ID: 15882470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
Sterne JA; Sutton AJ; Ioannidis JP; Terrin N; Jones DR; Lau J; Carpenter J; Rücker G; Harbord RM; Schmid CH; Tetzlaff J; Deeks JJ; Peters J; Macaskill P; Schwarzer G; Duval S; Altman DG; Moher D; Higgins JP
BMJ; 2011 Jul; 343():d4002. PubMed ID: 21784880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical considerations in evaluating pharmacogenomics-based clinical effect for confirmatory trials.
Wang SJ; O'Neill RT; Hung HJ
Clin Trials; 2010 Oct; 7(5):525-36. PubMed ID: 20595242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Publication bias in trials other than RCTs].
Timmer A
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 21530909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials.
Costantino G; Ceriani E; Rusconi AM; Montano N
JAMA; 2007 Jul; 298(1):39; author reply 39-40. PubMed ID: 17609487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sources of bias in clinical trials.
Pandis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):595-6. PubMed ID: 21967950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Meta-analysis].
D'Arrigo G; Provenzano F; Torino C; Zoccali C; Tripepi G
G Ital Nefrol; 2011; 28(5):531-6. PubMed ID: 22028267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Handoll HH; Gillespie LD; Gillespie WJ; Howe TE; Madhok R; Parker MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 May; (422):272; author reply 273-4. PubMed ID: 15187871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey.
Ahmed I; Sutton AJ; Riley RD
BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7762. PubMed ID: 22214758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Lying with statistic--today: the meta-analysis].
Gogol M
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Mar; 135(9):419; author reply 419-20. PubMed ID: 20180169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias.
Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; Montori V; Vist G; Kunz R; Brozek J; Alonso-Coello P; Djulbegovic B; Atkins D; Falck-Ytter Y; Williams JW; Meerpohl J; Norris SL; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1277-82. PubMed ID: 21802904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical methods can be improved within Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews.
Riley RD; Gates S; Neilson J; Alfirevic Z
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 64(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 21109399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A review of cluster randomized trials found statistical evidence of selection bias.
Bolzern J; Mnyama N; Bosanquet K; Torgerson DJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():106-112. PubMed ID: 29596972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.
Bennett DA; Latham NK; Stretton C; Anderson CS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15135835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A plea for a more fastidious and objective use of statistics.
Walters DE
J Assist Reprod Genet; 1994 Feb; 11(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 7819705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Adjusting for publication biases across similar interventions performed well when compared with gold standard data.
Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Ades AE; Cooper NJ; Abrams KR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1230-41. PubMed ID: 21530169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Publication bias and the efficacy of antidepressants.
Mathew SJ; Charney DS
Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Feb; 166(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 19188290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Confidence intervals and P-values for meta-analysis with publication bias.
Henmi M; Copas JB; Eguchi S
Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 17688500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Publication bias.
Parmley WW
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Nov; 24(5):1424-5. PubMed ID: 7930269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
