149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34936205)
1. Validation of automated complex head and neck treatment planning with pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Hedrick SG; Petro S; Ward A; Morris B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 23(2):e13510. PubMed ID: 34936205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preliminary evaluation of multifield and single-field optimization for the treatment planning of spot-scanning proton therapy of head and neck cancer.
Quan EM; Liu W; Wu R; Li Y; Frank SJ; Zhang X; Zhu XR; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081709. PubMed ID: 23927306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy optimization techniques for pediatric craniopharyngiomas: a clinical case study.
Yeung D; McKenzie C; Indelicato DJ
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2014 Jan; 61(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 24000229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance evaluation of adaptive aperture's static and dynamic collimation in a compact pencil beam scanning proton therapy system: A dosimetric comparison study for multiple disease sites.
Grewal HS; Ahmad S; Jin H
Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):179-187. PubMed ID: 33279369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Rana S; Rosenfeld AB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 23(2):e13512. PubMed ID: 34989458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of automated proton therapy plan adaptation for head and neck tumors using cone beam CT images.
Kurz C; Nijhuis R; Reiner M; Ganswindt U; Thieke C; Belka C; Parodi K; Landry G
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():64. PubMed ID: 27129305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technical Note: Plan-delivery-time constrained inverse optimization method with minimum-MU-per-energy-layer (MMPEL) for efficient pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Gao H; Clasie B; McDonald M; Langen KM; Liu T; Lin Y
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3892-3897. PubMed ID: 32614472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A single-field integrated boost treatment planning technique for spot scanning proton therapy.
Zhu XR; Poenisch F; Li H; Zhang X; Sahoo N; Wu RY; Li X; Lee AK; Chang EL; Choi S; Pugh T; Frank SJ; Gillin MT; Mahajan A; Grosshans DR
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Sep; 9():202. PubMed ID: 25212571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of PlanIQ Feasibility DVH for head and neck treatment planning.
Fried DV; Chera BS; Das SK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):245-250. PubMed ID: 28857470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Energy layer optimization strategies for intensity-modulated proton therapy of lung cancer patients.
Jensen MF; Hoffmann L; Petersen JBB; Møller DS; Alber M
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4355-4363. PubMed ID: 30129041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The rationale for intensity-modulated proton therapy in geometrically challenging cases.
Safai S; Trofimov A; Adams JA; Engelsman M; Bortfeld T
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6337-53. PubMed ID: 23965339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robust treatment planning in whole pelvis pencil beam scanning proton therapy for prostate cancer.
Butala AA; Ingram WS; O'Reilly SE; Hartl B; Kassaee A; Deville C; Vapiwala N
Med Dosim; 2020 Winter; 45(4):334-338. PubMed ID: 32471604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automating proton treatment planning with beam angle selection using Bayesian optimization.
Taasti VT; Hong L; Shim JSA; Deasy JO; Zarepisheh M
Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3286-3296. PubMed ID: 32356335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter-fraction motion robustness and organ sparing potential of proton therapy for cervical cancer.
Gort EM; Beukema JC; Matysiak W; Sijtsema NM; Aluwini S; Langendijk JA; Both S; Brouwer CL
Radiother Oncol; 2021 Jan; 154():194-200. PubMed ID: 32956707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Plan quality effects of maximum monitor unit constraints in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for central nervous system and skull base tumors.
Rao AD; Sun K; Zhu M; Mossahebi S; Sabouri P; Houser T; Jatczak J; Zakhary M; Regine WF; Miller RC; Bentzen S; Mishra MV
Radiother Oncol; 2021 Jul; 160():18-24. PubMed ID: 33753157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric study of uniform scanning proton therapy planning for prostate cancer patients with a metal hip prosthesis, and comparison with volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Rana S; Cheng C; Zheng Y; Hsi W; Zeidan O; Schreuder N; Vargas C; Larson G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 May; 15(3):4611. PubMed ID: 24892333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated intensity modulated treatment planning: The expedited constrained hierarchical optimization (ECHO) system.
Zarepisheh M; Hong L; Zhou Y; Oh JH; Mechalakos JG; Hunt MA; Mageras GS; Deasy JO
Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):2944-2954. PubMed ID: 31055858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
