These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34936236)

  • 1. Biobank Participants' Attitudes toward Requiring Understanding for Biobank Consent.
    Kasperbauer TJ; Halverson C; Garcia A; Schmidt KK; Schwartz PH
    Ethics Hum Res; 2022 Jan; 44(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 34936236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incorporating Biobank Consent into a Healthcare Setting: Challenges for Patient Understanding.
    Kasperbauer TJ; Schmidt KK; Thomas A; Perkins SM; Schwartz PH
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(2):113-122. PubMed ID: 33275086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.
    D'Abramo F; Schildmann J; Vollmann J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16():60. PubMed ID: 26354520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stakeholder perspectives on the ethico-legal dimensions of biobanking in South Africa.
    Singh S; Moodley K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Jul; 22(1):84. PubMed ID: 34210291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring Understanding of "Understanding": The Paradigm Case of Biobank Consent Comprehension.
    Beskow LM; Weinfurt KP
    Am J Bioeth; 2019 May; 19(5):6-18. PubMed ID: 31068107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An effective multisource informed consent procedure for research and clinical practice: an observational study of patient understanding and awareness of their roles as research stakeholders in a cancer biobank.
    Cervo S; Rovina J; Talamini R; Perin T; Canzonieri V; De Paoli P; Steffan A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2013 Jul; 14():30. PubMed ID: 23899250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed consent for biobanking: consensus-based guidelines for adequate comprehension.
    Beskow LM; Dombeck CB; Thompson CP; Watson-Ormond JK; Weinfurt KP
    Genet Med; 2015 Mar; 17(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 25144889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.
    Moodley K; Singh S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 27724893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Participants' Understanding of Informed Consent for Biobanking: A Systematic Review.
    Eisenhauer ER; Tait AR; Rieh SY; Arslanian-Engoren CM
    Clin Nurs Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 28745067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A qualitative study of participants' views on re-consent in a longitudinal biobank.
    Dixon-Woods M; Kocman D; Brewster L; Willars J; Laurie G; Tarrant C
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):22. PubMed ID: 28330487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed consent, biobank research, and locality: perceptions of breast cancer patients in three European countries.
    Petersen I; Desmedt C; Harris A; Buffa F; Kollek R
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):48-55. PubMed ID: 25746784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research participant understanding and engagement in an institutional, self-consent biobank model.
    Schmanski A; Roberts E; Coors M; Wicks SJ; Arbet J; Weber R; Crooks K; Barnes KC; Taylor MRG
    J Genet Couns; 2021 Feb; 30(1):257-267. PubMed ID: 32951257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biobank Participants' Attitudes Toward Data Sharing and Privacy: The Role of Trust in Reducing Perceived Risks.
    Kasperbauer TJ; Halverson C; Garcia A; Schwartz PH
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2022; 17(1-2):167-176. PubMed ID: 34779299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Still Rather Hazy at Present": Citizens' and Physicians' Views on Returning Results from Biobank Research Using Broad Consent.
    Barazzetti G; Cavalli S; Benaroyo L; Kaufmann A
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2017 Mar; 21(3):159-165. PubMed ID: 28177781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethics of dead participants: policy recommendations for biobank research.
    Ursin L; Stuifbergen M
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Oct; 44(10):695-699. PubMed ID: 29921618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standard Versus Simplified Consent Materials for Biobank Participation: Differences in Patient Knowledge and Trial Accrual.
    Garrett SB; Murphy M; Wiley J; Dohan D
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):326-334. PubMed ID: 29037106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of Plain Language Supplemental Materials for the Biobank Informed Consent Process.
    Drake BF; Brown KM; Gehlert S; Wolf LE; Seo J; Perkins H; Goodman MS; Kaphingst KA
    J Cancer Educ; 2017 Dec; 32(4):836-844. PubMed ID: 27037699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biobanks and the Moral Concerns of Donors: A Democratic Deliberation.
    De Vries RG; Ryan KA; Gordon L; Krenz CD; Tomlinson T; Jewell S; Kim SYH
    Qual Health Res; 2019 Nov; 29(13):1942-1953. PubMed ID: 30095038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practice evaluation of biobank ethics and governance: current needs and future perspectives.
    Langhof H; Schwietering J; Strech D
    J Med Genet; 2019 Mar; 56(3):176-185. PubMed ID: 30464052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Public's attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey.
    Porteri C; Pasqualetti P; Togni E; Parker M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Nov; 15():81. PubMed ID: 25425352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.