These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34936932)

  • 21. Comprehensive target populations for current active safety systems using national crash databases.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(7):753-61. PubMed ID: 24433115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simulator training with a forward collision warning system: effects on driver-system interactions and driver trust.
    Koustanaï A; Cavallo V; Delhomme P; Mas A
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):709-21. PubMed ID: 23156617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. "Cyclist at 12 o'clock!": a systematic review of in-vehicle advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) for preventing car-rider crashes.
    Useche SA; Faus M; Alonso F
    Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1335209. PubMed ID: 38439758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How automated vehicles should operate to avoid fatal crashes with cyclists?
    Utriainen R; Pöllänen M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 May; 154():106097. PubMed ID: 33780803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gaze position modulates the effectiveness of forward collision warnings for drowsy drivers.
    Gaspar JG; Schwarz CW; Brown TL; Kang J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():25-30. PubMed ID: 29277383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Simulating Automated Emergency Braking with and without Torricelli Vacuum Emergency Braking for cyclists: Effect of brake deceleration and sensor field-of-view on accidents, injuries and fatalities.
    Jeppsson H; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105538. PubMed ID: 32470821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of speed limit reductions in urban areas on cyclists' injuries in collisions with cars.
    Isaksson-Hellman I; Töreki J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup3):39-44. PubMed ID: 31800325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Drivers passing cyclists: How does sight distance affect safety? Results from a naturalistic study.
    Rasch A; Tarakanov Y; Tellwe G; Dozza M
    J Safety Res; 2023 Dec; 87():76-85. PubMed ID: 38081725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The most difficult at-fault fatal crashes to avoid with current active safety technology.
    Koisaari T; Utriainen R; Kari T; Tervo T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Feb; 135():105396. PubMed ID: 31838323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adaptive forward collision warning system for hazmat truck drivers: Considering differential driving behavior and risk levels.
    Shao Y; Shi X; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Xu Y; Chen W; Ye Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107221. PubMed ID: 37473523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How do drivers negotiate intersections with pedestrians? The importance of pedestrian time-to-arrival and visibility.
    Dozza M; Boda CN; Jaber L; Thalya P; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jun; 141():105524. PubMed ID: 32402866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effectiveness of centerline rumble strips (CLRS) on two-lane carriageways in Sweden on injury accident risk for cars equipped with electronic stability control (ESC) and cars without ESC.
    Sternlund S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(8):880-885. PubMed ID: 31710510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Changes in car drivers' attitudes and behaviours, and cyclist numbers following the introduction of a cyclist minimum passing distance law.
    Fruhen LS; Rossen I; Kanse L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jun; 156():106108. PubMed ID: 33873134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect on road safety of a modal shift from car to bicycle.
    Stipdonk H; Reurings M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(4):412-21. PubMed ID: 22817557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. AEB effectiveness evaluation based on car-to-cyclist accident reconstructions using video of drive recorder.
    Zhao Y; Ito D; Mizuno K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 30822153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Aging: Older Adults' Driving Behavior Using Longitudinal and Lateral Warning Systems.
    Souders DJ; Charness N; Roque NA; Pham H
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):229-248. PubMed ID: 31361158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Forward collision warning based on a driver model to increase drivers' acceptance.
    Puente Guillen P; Gohl I
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S21-S26. PubMed ID: 31381428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In-depth analysis of crash contributing factors and potential ADAS interventions among at-risk drivers using the SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study.
    Seacrist T; Maheshwari J; Sarfare S; Chingas G; Thirkill M; Loeb HS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S68-S73. PubMed ID: 34663136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Predicting crash-relevant violations at stop sign-controlled intersections for the development of an intersection driver assistance system.
    Scanlon JM; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():59-65. PubMed ID: 27586104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interaction driver-bicyclist on rural roads: Effects of cross-sections and road geometric elements.
    Bella F; Silvestri M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():191-201. PubMed ID: 28319757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.