BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34940110)

  • 1. Individual Differences in Belief in Fake News about Election Fraud after the 2020 U.S. Election.
    Calvillo DP; Rutchick AM; Garcia RJB
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2021 Dec; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 34940110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Social Psychological Predictors of Belief in Fake News in the Run-Up to the 2019 Hungarian Elections: The Importance of Conspiracy Mentality Supports the Notion of Ideological Symmetry in Fake News Belief.
    Szebeni Z; Lönnqvist JE; Jasinskaja-Lahti I
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():790848. PubMed ID: 35002884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Partisan bias in false memories for misinformation about the 2021 U.S. Capitol riot.
    Calvillo DP; Harris JD; Hawkins WC
    Memory; 2023 Jan; 31(1):137-146. PubMed ID: 36170037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.
    Bago B; Rand DG; Pennycook G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Aug; 149(8):1608-1613. PubMed ID: 31916834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fake news reminders and veracity labels differentially benefit memory and belief accuracy for news headlines.
    Kemp PL; Loaiza VM; Wahlheim CN
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21829. PubMed ID: 36528666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Grinberg N; Joseph K; Friedland L; Swire-Thompson B; Lazer D
    Science; 2019 Jan; 363(6425):374-378. PubMed ID: 30679368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 280 characters to the White House: predicting 2020 U.S. presidential elections from twitter data.
    Rizk R; Rizk D; Rizk F; Hsu S
    Comput Math Organ Theory; 2023 Mar; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 37360912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news.
    Pennycook G; Cannon TD; Rand DG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Dec; 147(12):1865-1880. PubMed ID: 30247057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Online engagement with 2020 election misinformation and turnout in the 2021 Georgia runoff election.
    Green J; Hobbs W; McCabe S; Lazer D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(34):e2115900119. PubMed ID: 35972960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "I feel it in my gut:" Epistemic Motivations, Political Beliefs, and Misperceptions of COVID-19 and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Young DG; Maloney EK; Bleakley A; Langbaum J
    J Soc Polit Psychol; 2022; 10(2):643-656. PubMed ID: 36960233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.
    Pennycook G; Rand DG
    Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():39-50. PubMed ID: 29935897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An initial accuracy focus reduces the effect of prior exposure on perceived accuracy of news headlines.
    Calvillo DP; Smelter TJ
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Nov; 5(1):55. PubMed ID: 33151449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Media Source Characteristics Regarding Food Fraud Misinformation According to the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) in China: Comparative Study.
    Chang A; Schulz PJ; Jiao W; Yu G; Yang Y
    JMIR Form Res; 2022 Mar; 6(3):e32302. PubMed ID: 34939565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The illusory truth effect: A review of how repetition increases belief in misinformation.
    Udry J; Barber SJ
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2024 Apr; 56():101736. PubMed ID: 38113667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Timing matters when correcting fake news.
    Brashier NM; Pennycook G; Berinsky AJ; Rand DG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(5):. PubMed ID: 33495336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A belief systems analysis of fraud beliefs following the 2020 US election.
    Botvinik-Nezer R; Jones M; Wager TD
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Jul; 7(7):1106-1119. PubMed ID: 37037989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determinants of individuals' belief in fake news: A scoping review determinants of belief in fake news.
    Bryanov K; Vziatysheva V
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253717. PubMed ID: 34166478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. False memory and COVID-19: How people fall for fake news about COVID-19 in digital contexts.
    Mangiulli I; Battista F; Kafi NA; Coveliers E; Webster TC; Curci A; Otgaar H
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():972004. PubMed ID: 36312068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Could Belief in Fake News Predict Vaccination Behavior in the Elderly?
    Pakalniškienė V; Kairys A; Jurkuvėnas V; Mikuličiūtė V; Ivleva V
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 36429616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.