These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34940110)

  • 21. Emotion may predict susceptibility to fake news but emotion regulation does not seem to help.
    Bago B; Rosenzweig LR; Berinsky AJ; Rand DG
    Cogn Emot; 2022 Sep; 36(6):1166-1180. PubMed ID: 35749076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election.
    Bovet A; Makse HA
    Nat Commun; 2019 Jan; 10(1):7. PubMed ID: 30602729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Memory and belief updating following complete and partial reminders of fake news.
    Kemp PL; Sinclair AH; Adcock RA; Wahlheim CN
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 May; 9(1):28. PubMed ID: 38713308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Are we willing to share what we believe is true? Factors influencing susceptibility to fake news.
    Piksa M; Noworyta K; Gundersen AB; Kunst J; Morzy M; Piasecki J; Rygula R
    Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1165103. PubMed ID: 37654985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nevertheless, partisanship persisted: fake news warnings help briefly, but bias returns with time.
    Grady RH; Ditto PH; Loftus EF
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Jul; 6(1):52. PubMed ID: 34297248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon.
    Swire B; Berinsky AJ; Lewandowsky S; Ecker UK
    R Soc Open Sci; 2017 Mar; 4(3):160802. PubMed ID: 28405366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.
    Ahmed W; Vidal-Alaball J; Downing J; López Seguí F
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 May; 22(5):e19458. PubMed ID: 32352383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Everyday non-partisan fake news: Sharing behavior, platform specificity, and detection.
    Shephard MP; Robertson DJ; Huhe N; Anderson A
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1118407. PubMed ID: 37255519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perceived Negative Political Climate Among Hispanic/Latino Adolescents Before and After the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election: Associations with Internalizing Symptoms and Substance Use.
    Montero-Zamora P; Vos SR; Unger JB; Zeledon I; Lee R; Soto DW; Brown EC; Duque M; Garcia MF; Scaramutti C; Ertanir B; Schwartz SJ
    Int J Intercult Relat; 2023 May; 94():. PubMed ID: 37091741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news.
    Martel C; Pennycook G; Rand DG
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Oct; 5(1):47. PubMed ID: 33026546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. True, justified, belief? Partisanship weakens the positive effect of news media literacy on fake news detection.
    Sude DJ; Sharon G; Dvir-Gvirsman S
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1242865. PubMed ID: 37823073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Age, education, and political involvement differences in daily election-related stress.
    Early AS; Smith EL; Neupert SD
    Curr Psychol; 2022 May; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 35669213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Of pandemics, politics, and personality: The role of conscientiousness and political ideology in the sharing of fake news.
    Lawson MA; Kakkar H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 May; 151(5):1154-1177. PubMed ID: 34694858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Social media's contribution to political misperceptions in U.S. Presidential elections.
    Garrett RK
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213500. PubMed ID: 30917154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. State Resident Handedness, Ideology, and Political Party Preference: U.S. Presidential Election Outcomes Over the Past 60 Years.
    McCann SJH
    Psychol Rep; 2024 Jan; ():332941241227521. PubMed ID: 38214567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Character deprecation in fake news: Is it in supply or demand?
    McPhetres J; Rand DG; Pennycook G
    Group Process Intergroup Relat; 2021 Jun; 24(4):624-637. PubMed ID: 34121911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The dangers of blind trust: Examining the interplay among social media news use, misinformation identification, and news trust on conspiracy beliefs.
    Xiao X; Borah P; Su Y
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 Nov; 30(8):977-992. PubMed ID: 33663279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook.
    Guess A; Nagler J; Tucker J
    Sci Adv; 2019 Jan; 5(1):eaau4586. PubMed ID: 30662946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election.
    Chen E; Deb A; Ferrara E
    J Comput Soc Sci; 2022; 5(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33824934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas.
    Klimek P; Aykaç A; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293239. PubMed ID: 37967045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.