These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34940461)

  • 1. Geometrical Influence on Particle Transport in Cross-Flow Ultrafiltration: Cylindrical and Flat Sheet Membranes.
    Park GW; Nägele G
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Dec; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 34940461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling cross-flow ultrafiltration of permeable particle dispersions.
    Park GW; Nägele G
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Nov; 153(20):204110. PubMed ID: 33261472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrafiltration modeling of non-ionic microgels.
    Roa R; Zholkovskiy EK; Nägele G
    Soft Matter; 2015 May; 11(20):4106-22. PubMed ID: 25921331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Numerical Modelling Assisted Design of a Compact Ultrafiltration (UF) Flat Sheet Membrane Module.
    Bopape MF; Van Geel T; Dutta A; Van der Bruggen B; Onyango MS
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 33466652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasonic assisted ultrafiltration process for emulsification of oil field produced water treatment.
    Agi A; Junin R; Alqatta AYM; Gbadamosi A; Yahya A; Abbas A
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2019 Mar; 51():214-222. PubMed ID: 30401623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrafiltration of charge-stabilized dispersions at low salinity.
    Roa R; Menne D; Riest J; Buzatu P; Zholkovskiy EK; Dhont JK; Wessling M; Nägele G
    Soft Matter; 2016 May; 12(20):4638-53. PubMed ID: 27113088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of effect of particles on cake layer compressibility during ultrafiltration of upflow biological activated carbon effluent.
    Ao L; Liu W; Zhang M; Wang X
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 619-620():232-238. PubMed ID: 29149747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of membrane configuration on bench-scale MF and UF fouling experiments.
    Howe KJ; Marwah A; Chiu KP; Adham SS
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3842-9. PubMed ID: 17582459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Water quality monitoring in membrane filtration systems.
    Abogrean EM; Boerlage SF; Kennedy MD; El-Azizi IM; Galjaard G; Schippers JS
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Mar; 984():85-96. PubMed ID: 12783812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flocculation/flotation/ultrafiltration integrated process for the treatment of cork processing wastewaters.
    Minhalma M; de Pinho MN
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Dec; 35(24):4916-21. PubMed ID: 11775171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of ultra- and microfiltration in the presence and absence of secondary flow with polysaccharides, proteins, and yeast suspensions.
    Gehlert G; Luque S; Belfort G
    Biotechnol Prog; 1998; 14(6):931-42. PubMed ID: 9841658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Membrane flux dynamics in the submerged ultrafiltration hybrid treatment process during particle and natural organic matter removal.
    Zhang W; Zhang X; Li Y; Wang J; Chen C
    J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(12):1970-6. PubMed ID: 22432326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrosorptive removal of organic water constituents by positively charged electrically conductive UF membranes.
    Mantel T; Jacki E; Ernst M
    Water Res; 2021 Aug; 201():117318. PubMed ID: 34134036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of skim milk treated with high hydrostatic pressure on permeate flux and fouling during ultrafiltration.
    Leu M; Marciniak A; Chamberland J; Pouliot Y; Bazinet L; Doyen A
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Sep; 100(9):7071-7082. PubMed ID: 28647330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response surface methodology to investigate the effects of operational parameters on membrane fouling and organic matter rejection in hard-shell encased hollow-fiber membrane.
    Jang H; Park SJ; Kim J
    Chemosphere; 2022 Jan; 287(Pt 2):132132. PubMed ID: 34500327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting membrane flux decline from complex mixtures using flow-field flow fractionation measurements and semi-empirical theory.
    Pellegrino J; Wright S; Ranvill J; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):85-92. PubMed ID: 16003965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adsorption - Membrane process for treatment of stabilized municipal landfill leachate.
    Zielińska M; Kulikowska D; Stańczak M
    Waste Manag; 2020 Aug; 114():174-182. PubMed ID: 32679475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Membrane bioreactors for water reclamation.
    Tao G; Kekre K; Wei Z; Lee TC; Viswanath B; Seah H
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):431-40. PubMed ID: 16004005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
    Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.