136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34941052)
41. Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging of Invasive Breast Cancer: Correlations With Prognostic Factors and Molecular Subtypes.
Kang HS; Kim JY; Kim JJ; Kim S; Lee NK; Lee JW; Suh HB; Hwangbo L; Son Y; Grimm R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jul; 56(1):110-120. PubMed ID: 34792837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Cindil E; Oner Y; Sendur HN; Ozdemir H; Gazel E; Tunc L; Cerit MN
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2019 Nov; 70(4):441-451. PubMed ID: 31561925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The Role of Combined Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Differentiating Malignant From Benign Breast Lesions Presenting Washout Curve.
Tezcan S; Ozturk FU; Uslu N; Akcay EY
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2021 Aug; 72(3):460-469. PubMed ID: 32157892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Analysis of kinetic curve and model-based perfusion parameters on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in breast cancer patients: Correlations with dominant stroma type.
Yim H; Kang DK; Jung YS; Jeon GS; Kim TH
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jan; 34(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 26234500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The diagnostic dilemma with the plateau pattern of the time-intensity curve: can the relative apparent diffusion coefficient (rADC) optimise the ADC parameter for differentiating breast lesions?
Tang W; Chen L; Jin Z; Liang Y; Zuo W; Wei X; Guo Y; Kong Q; Jiang X
Clin Radiol; 2021 Sep; 76(9):688-695. PubMed ID: 34134856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging combined with apparent diffusion coefficient in the differentiation of benign and malignant diseases of the breast.
Ao F; Yan Y; Zhang ZL; Li S; Li WJ; Chen GB
Acta Radiol; 2022 Jul; 63(7):891-900. PubMed ID: 34134527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Assessment of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in distinguishing different histologic grades of breast phyllode tumor.
Yi Z; Xie M; Shi G; Cheng Z; Zeng H; Jiang N; Wu Z
Eur Radiol; 2022 Mar; 32(3):1601-1610. PubMed ID: 34491383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Analysis of Volumetric Perfusion Quantitative Parameters Using CS-VIBE Breast Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MR Imaging.
Chang YW; Lee EJ; Hwang J; Nickel D; Sung JK
Curr Med Imaging; 2023; 19(11):1286-1294. PubMed ID: 36165524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size.
Partridge SC; Mullins CD; Kurland BF; Allain MD; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1664-73. PubMed ID: 20489111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Ultrasound in Breast Cancer.
Kim Y; Kim SH; Song BJ; Kang BJ; Yim KI; Lee A; Nam Y
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(4):682-691. PubMed ID: 29962874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Adding a Model-free Diffusion MRI Marker to BI-RADS Assessment Improves Specificity for Diagnosing Breast Lesions.
Goto M; Le Bihan D; Yoshida M; Sakai K; Yamada K
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 31112086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Significance of the ADC ratio in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.
Zhao J; Guan H; Li M; Gu H; Qin J; Wu X
Acta Radiol; 2016 Apr; 57(4):422-9. PubMed ID: 26071495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiating benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumors.
Li HM; Feng F; Qiang JW; Zhang GF; Zhao SH; Ma FH; Li YA; Gu WY
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Nov; 43(11):3132-3141. PubMed ID: 29556691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of Abbreviated MRI and Full Diagnostic MRI in Distinguishing between Benign and Malignant Lesions Detected by Breast MRI: A Multireader Study.
Kim ES; Cho N; Kim SY; Kwon BR; Yi A; Ha SM; Lee SH; Chang JM; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 22(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 33289355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Separation of benign and malignant breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in a biopsy cohort.
Kim SG; Freed M; Leite APK; Zhang J; Seuss C; Moy L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1385-1393. PubMed ID: 27766710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Diffusion Kurtosis at 3.0T as an in vivo Imaging Marker for Breast Cancer Characterization: Correlation With Prognostic Factors.
Huang Y; Lin Y; Hu W; Ma C; Lin W; Wang Z; Liang J; Ye W; Zhao J; Wu R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):845-856. PubMed ID: 30260589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for differentiating lung cancer from benign solitary pulmonary lesions.
Yuan M; Zhang YD; Zhu C; Yu TF; Shi HB; Shi ZF; Li H; Wu JF
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):669-79. PubMed ID: 26340144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Characteristics of quantitative perfusion parameters on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in mammographically occult breast cancer.
Ryu JK; Rhee SJ; Song JY; Cho SH; Jahng GH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):377-390. PubMed ID: 27685105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Diffusion tensor imaging for characterizing tumor microstructure and improving diagnostic performance on breast MRI: a prospective observational study.
Luo J; Hippe DS; Rahbar H; Parsian S; Rendi MH; Partridge SC
Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Sep; 21(1):102. PubMed ID: 31484577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as imaging markers for angiogenesis and proliferation in human breast cancer.
Li L; Wang K; Sun X; Wang K; Sun Y; Zhang G; Shen B
Med Sci Monit; 2015 Feb; 21():376-82. PubMed ID: 25640082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
