These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34941363)

  • 1. Scalable Science Education via Online Cooperative Questioning.
    Hilton CB; Goldwater MB; Hancock D; Clemson M; Huang A; Denyer G
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2022 Mar; 21(1):ar4. PubMed ID: 34941363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise.
    Guilding C; Pye RE; Butler S; Atkinson M; Field E
    Pharmacol Res Perspect; 2021 Aug; 9(4):e00833. PubMed ID: 34309243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Embedding retrieval practice in undergraduate biochemistry teaching using PeerWise.
    Higgins T; Dudley E; Bodger O; Newton P; Francis N
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2024; 52(2):156-164. PubMed ID: 37929789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A participatory learning approach to biochemistry using student authored and evaluated multiple-choice questions.
    Bottomley S; Denny P
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2011; 39(5):352-61. PubMed ID: 21948507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PeerWise provides significant academic benefits to biological science students across diverse learning tasks, but with minimal instructor intervention.
    McQueen HA; Shields C; Finnegan DJ; Higham J; Simmen MW
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2014; 42(5):371-81. PubMed ID: 24974789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance.
    Walsh JL; Harris BHL; Denny P; Smith P
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Feb; 94(1108):97-103. PubMed ID: 28866607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Student generation and peer review of examination questions in the dental curriculum: Enhancing student engagement and learning.
    Nguyen KA; Lucas C; Leadbeatter D
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2020 Aug; 24(3):548-558. PubMed ID: 32347592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer generation of multiple-choice questions: student engagement and experiences.
    Rhind SM; Pettigrew GW
    J Vet Med Educ; 2012; 39(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 23187030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.
    Grainger R; Dai W; Osborne E; Kenwright D
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 30134898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nursing students collaborating to develop multiple-choice exam revision questions: A student engagement study.
    Craft JA; Christensen M; Shaw N; Bakon S
    Nurse Educ Today; 2017 Dec; 59():6-11. PubMed ID: 28898728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using the Jigsaw Method to Teach Abdominal Anatomy.
    Oakes DJ; Hegedus EM; Ollerenshaw SL; Drury H; Ritchie HE
    Anat Sci Educ; 2019 May; 12(3):272-283. PubMed ID: 30179312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving large class performance and engagement through student-generated question banks.
    Hancock D; Hare N; Denny P; Denyer G
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2018 Jul; 46(4):306-317. PubMed ID: 29528559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementing goals for non-cognitive outcomes within a basic science course.
    Derstine PL
    Acad Med; 2002 Sep; 77(9):931-2. PubMed ID: 12228102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Engaging Oral Health Students in Learning Basic Science Through Assessment That Weaves in Personal Experience.
    Leadbeatter D; Gao J
    J Dent Educ; 2018 Apr; 82(4):388-398. PubMed ID: 29606656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education.
    Secomb J
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(6):703-16. PubMed ID: 18047577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why peer assessment helps to improve clinical performance in undergraduate physical therapy education: a mixed methods design.
    Maas MJ; Sluijsmans DM; van der Wees PJ; Heerkens YF; Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW; van der Vleuten CP
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Jun; 14():117. PubMed ID: 24928420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is Reflective Learning Visible in Online Discussion Forums for Medical Students on General Practice Placements? A Qualitative Study.
    Gillingham K; Eggleton K; Goodyear-Smith F
    Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(4):434-441. PubMed ID: 32174178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positive Impact of Multiple-Choice Question Authoring and Regular Quiz Participation on Student Learning.
    Riggs CD; Kang S; Rennie O
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2020 Jun; 19(2):ar16. PubMed ID: 32357094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.