These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34941936)

  • 1. Self-protective and self-sacrificing preferences of pedestrians and passengers in moral dilemmas involving autonomous vehicles.
    Mayer MM; Bell R; Buchner A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261673. PubMed ID: 34941936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Autonomous vehicles: How perspective-taking accessibility alters moral judgments and consumer purchasing behavior.
    Martin R; Kusev P; van Schaik P
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104666. PubMed ID: 33930784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should it stay, or swerve? Trading off lives in dilemma situations involving autonomous cars.
    Habla W; Kataria M; Martinsson P; Roeder K
    Health Econ; 2024 May; 33(5):929-951. PubMed ID: 38278781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles.
    Bonnefon JF; Shariff A; Rahwan I
    Science; 2016 Jun; 352(6293):1573-6. PubMed ID: 27339987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Humans, machines, and double standards? The moral evaluation of the actions of autonomous vehicles, anthropomorphized autonomous vehicles, and human drivers in road-accident dilemmas.
    Mayer MM; Buchner A; Bell R
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1052729. PubMed ID: 36687966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk of Injury in Moral Dilemmas With Autonomous Vehicles.
    de Melo CM; Marsella S; Gratch J
    Front Robot AI; 2020; 7():572529. PubMed ID: 34212006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vulnerable Road Users and Connected Autonomous Vehicles Interaction: A Survey.
    Reyes-Muñoz A; Guerrero-Ibáñez J
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(12):. PubMed ID: 35746397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. External Human-Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles from Pedestrians' Perspective: A Survey Study.
    Guo J; Yuan Q; Yu J; Chen X; Yu W; Cheng Q; Wang W; Luo W; Jiang X
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 35591029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guilt Without Fault: Accidental Agency in the Era of Autonomous Vehicles.
    Aguiar F; Hannikainen IR; Aguilar P
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2022 Feb; 28(2):11. PubMed ID: 35201428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving the experience in the pedestrian's interaction with an autonomous vehicle: An ergonomic comparison of external HMI.
    Métayer N; Coeugnet S
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Oct; 96():103478. PubMed ID: 34116413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Understanding complex traffic road scenes: The case of child-pedestrians' hazard perception.
    Meir A; Oron-Gilad T
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():111-126. PubMed ID: 32199554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 'Utilitarian' judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good.
    Kahane G; Everett JA; Earp BD; Farias M; Savulescu J
    Cognition; 2015 Jan; 134():193-209. PubMed ID: 25460392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Underestimation tendencies of vehicle speed by pedestrians when crossing unmarked roadway.
    Papić Z; Jović A; Simeunović M; Saulić N; Lazarević M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105586. PubMed ID: 32454262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deriving functional safety (ISO 26262) S-parameters for vulnerable road users from national crash data.
    Krampe J; Junge M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105884. PubMed ID: 33360036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research on the influence and mechanism of human-vehicle moral matching on trust in autonomous vehicles.
    Chen N; Zu Y; Song J
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1071872. PubMed ID: 37325750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings.
    Sucha M; Dostal D; Risser R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():41-50. PubMed ID: 28259827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.
    Conway P; Goldstein-Greenwood J; Polacek D; Greene JD
    Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():241-265. PubMed ID: 30064654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Left-turning vehicle-pedestrian conflicts at signalized intersections with traffic lights: Benefit or harm? A two-stage study.
    He YL; Li RT; Li L; Schwebel DC; Huang HL; Yin QY; Hu GQ
    Chin J Traumatol; 2019 Apr; 22(2):63-68. PubMed ID: 30962130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pedestrian's risk-based negotiation model for self-driving vehicles to get the right of way.
    Gupta S; Vasardani M; Lohani B; Winter S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():163-173. PubMed ID: 30660067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elderly pedestrians' self-regulation failures and crash involvement: The development of typologies.
    Nakagawa Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Dec; 133():105281. PubMed ID: 31590094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.