These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34942153)
21. Construction and validation of the midsagittal reference plane based on the skull base symmetry for three-dimensional cephalometric craniofacial analysis. Kim HJ; Kim BC; Kim JG; Zhengguo P; Kang SH; Lee SH J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 25(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 24469365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Does two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional surgical simulation produce better surgical outcomes among patients with class III facial asymmetry? Udomlarptham N; Lin CH; Wang YC; Ko EW Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1022-1031. PubMed ID: 29606563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A novel method for 3D face symmetry reference plane based on weighted Procrustes analysis algorithm. Zhu Y; Zheng S; Yang G; Fu X; Xiao N; Wen A; Wang Y; Zhao Y BMC Oral Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):319. PubMed ID: 33176780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Correlation between hard tissue and soft tissue landmarks. Economou S; Stoustrup P; Kristensen KD; Dalstra M; Küseler A; Herlin T; Pedersen TK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 May; 153(5):662-672.e1. PubMed ID: 29706214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Retrograde lag screw placement in anterior acetabular column with regard to the anterior pelvic plane and midsagittal plane -- virtual mapping of 260 three-dimensional hemipelvises for quantitative anatomic analysis. Ochs BG; Stuby FM; Ateschrang A; Stoeckle U; Gonser CE Injury; 2014 Oct; 45(10):1590-8. PubMed ID: 25062600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Establishment of a Reliable Horizontal Reference Plane for 3-Dimensional Facial Soft Tissue Evaluation Before and After Orthognathic Surgery. Chortrakarnkij P; Lonic D; Lin HH; Lo LJ Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 78(3 Suppl 2):S139-S147. PubMed ID: 28195892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Computer-assisted planning, stereolithographic modeling, and intraoperative navigation for complex orbital reconstruction: a descriptive study in a preliminary cohort. Bell RB; Markiewicz MR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 67(12):2559-70. PubMed ID: 19925972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Comparison between computer aided simulation and dental model orthognathic surgery for the treatment of patients with mandibular excess and facial asymmetries]. Shen SY; Chen TT; Lu CP; Jiang TF; Wang XD; Shen GF Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):651-655. PubMed ID: 27806756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic image reorientation using soft tissues as reference for facial asymmetry diagnosis. Lee JK; Jung PK; Moon CH Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 23758600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A simple and accurate craniofacial midsagittal plane definition. Green MN; Bloom JM; Kulbersh R Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):355-363. PubMed ID: 28863916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessing Facial Asymmetry in Postoperative Patients With Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis. Gabrick KS; Wu RT; Singh A; Bartlett SP; Taylor JA; Persing JA; Alperovich M J Craniofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 31(4):1000-1005. PubMed ID: 32176017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Maxillary yaw as the primary predictor of maxillary dental midline deviation: 3D analysis using cone-beam computed tomography. Song WW; Kim SS; Sándor GK; Kim YD J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 71(4):752-62. PubMed ID: 23010372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetry through cone-beam computerized tomography. Cevidanes LH; Alhadidi A; Paniagua B; Styner M; Ludlow J; Mol A; Turvey T; Proffit WR; Rossouw PE Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jun; 111(6):757-70. PubMed ID: 21497527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of the matching optimal symmetry plane method in planning surgical correction of facial asymmetry--a preliminary report of 20 patients. Wong TY; Liu JK; Fang JJ; Wu TC; Tu YH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1180.e1-13. PubMed ID: 24742699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Determining the midsagittal reference plane for evaluating facial asymmetries. Thiesen G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Dec; 150(6):908-909. PubMed ID: 27894533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Common 3-dimensional coordinate system for assessment of directional changes. Ruellas AC; Tonello C; Gomes LR; Yatabe MS; Macron L; Lopinto J; Goncalves JR; Garib Carreira DG; Alonso N; Souki BQ; Coqueiro Rda S; Cevidanes LH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 May; 149(5):645-56. PubMed ID: 27131246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Advances in determination of median sagittal plane of facial soft tissue]. Xiao N; Wang Y; Zhao YJ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 53(7):495-499. PubMed ID: 29996372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Real-time three-dimensional ultrasound with Live xPlane imaging assists first-trimester acquisition of a true midsagittal section. Xiong Y; Wah YM; Chan LW; Leung TY; Fung TY; Lau TK Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 20201112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of 2 different reference planes used for the study of asymmetric facial malformations. Pelo S; Deli R; Correra P; Boniello R; Gasparini G; Moro A J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 20(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 19164986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]