BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34943823)

  • 1. Sperm Inspection for In Vitro Fertilization via Self-Assembled Microdroplet Formation and Quantitative Phase Microscopy.
    Atzitz Y; Dudaie M; Barnea I; Shaked NT
    Cells; 2021 Nov; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 34943823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual sperm selection by microfluidics integrated with interferometric phase microscopy.
    Eravuchira PJ; Mirsky SK; Barnea I; Levi M; Balberg M; Shaked NT
    Methods; 2018 Mar; 136():152-159. PubMed ID: 28958952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Partially spatially coherent digital holographic microscopy and machine learning for quantitative analysis of human spermatozoa under oxidative stress condition.
    Dubey V; Popova D; Ahmad A; Acharya G; Basnet P; Mehta DS; Ahluwalia BS
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):3564. PubMed ID: 30837490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High spatially sensitive quantitative phase imaging assisted with deep neural network for classification of human spermatozoa under stressed condition.
    Butola A; Popova D; Prasad DK; Ahmad A; Habib A; Tinguely JC; Basnet P; Acharya G; Senthilkumaran P; Mehta DS; Ahluwalia BS
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13118. PubMed ID: 32753627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microfluidic chips as a method for sperm selection improve fertilization rate in couples with fertilization failure.
    Mirsanei JS; Sheibak N; Zandieh Z; Mehdizadeh M; Aflatoonian R; Tabatabaei M; Mousavi AS; Amjadi F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 306(3):901-910. PubMed ID: 35650258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Novel technologies for selecting the best sperm for in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Sakkas D
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Mar; 99(4):1023-9. PubMed ID: 23357456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated analysis of individual sperm cells using stain-free interferometric phase microscopy and machine learning.
    Mirsky SK; Barnea I; Levi M; Greenspan H; Shaked NT
    Cytometry A; 2017 Sep; 91(9):893-900. PubMed ID: 28834185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Holographic imaging of unlabelled sperm cells for semen analysis: a review.
    Di Caprio G; Ferrara MA; Miccio L; Merola F; Memmolo P; Ferraro P; Coppola G
    J Biophotonics; 2015 Oct; 8(10):779-89. PubMed ID: 25491593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sperm:oocyte ratios in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program.
    Fiorentino A; Magli MC; Fortini D; Feliciani E; Ferraretti AP; Dale B; Gianaroli L
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1994 Feb; 11(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 7819709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microdroplet in vitro fertilization can reduce the number of spermatozoa necessary for fertilizing oocytes.
    Hasegawa A; Mochida K; Tomishima T; Inoue K; Ogura A
    J Reprod Dev; 2014; 60(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 24583808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital holographic microscopy for the evaluation of human sperm structure.
    Coppola G; Di Caprio G; Wilding M; Ferraro P; Esposito G; Di Matteo L; Dale R; Coppola G; Dale B
    Zygote; 2014 Nov; 22(4):446-54. PubMed ID: 23469807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphology in intracytoplasmic sperm injection: preliminary results.
    Küpker W; al-Hasani S; Schulze W; Kühnel W; Schill T; Felberbaum R; Diedrich K
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Oct; 12(9):620-6. PubMed ID: 8580661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Application of microfluidics in sperm isolation and in vitro fertilization].
    Li FF; Wang XY; Zhou SM; You F
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 May; 20(5):452-9. PubMed ID: 24908739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer software (SiD) assisted real-time single sperm selection associated with fertilization and blastocyst formation.
    Mendizabal-Ruiz G; Chavez-Badiola A; Aguilar Figueroa I; Martinez Nuño V; Flores-Saiffe Farias A; Valencia-Murilloa R; Drakeley A; Garcia-Sandoval JP; Cohen J
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Oct; 45(4):703-711. PubMed ID: 35989168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microfluidics for sperm research.
    Knowlton SM; Sadasivam M; Tasoglu S
    Trends Biotechnol; 2015 Apr; 33(4):221-9. PubMed ID: 25798781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using ejaculated, fresh, and frozen-thawed epididymal and testicular spermatozoa gives rise to comparable results after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Nagy Z; Liu J; Cecile J; Silber S; Devroey P; Van Steirteghem A
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Apr; 63(4):808-15. PubMed ID: 7890067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sperm selection in IVF: the long and winding road from bench to bedside.
    Pedrosa ML; Furtado MH; Ferreira MCF; Carneiro MM
    JBRA Assist Reprod; 2020 Jul; 24(3):332-339. PubMed ID: 32155013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sperm processing for advanced reproductive technologies: Where are we today?
    Rappa KL; Rodriguez HF; Hakkarainen GC; Anchan RM; Mutter GL; Asghar W
    Biotechnol Adv; 2016; 34(5):578-587. PubMed ID: 26845061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sperm-cell DNA fragmentation prediction using label-free quantitative phase imaging and deep learning.
    Noy L; Barnea I; Mirsky SK; Kamber D; Levi M; Shaked NT
    Cytometry A; 2023 Jun; 103(6):470-478. PubMed ID: 36333835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sperm selection methods in the 21st century.
    Vaughan DA; Sakkas D
    Biol Reprod; 2019 Dec; 101(6):1076-1082. PubMed ID: 30801632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.