These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34944315)

  • 41. Study on Consumer Preference for Traceable Pork With Animal Welfare Attribute.
    Chen M; Hu E; Kuen LL; Wu L
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():675554. PubMed ID: 34276494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Supply Chain's Role in Improving Animal Welfare.
    Harvey D; Hubbard C
    Animals (Basel); 2013 Aug; 3(3):767-85. PubMed ID: 26479533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The United States pork niche market phenomenon.
    Honeyman MS; Pirog RS; Huber GH; Lammers PJ; Hermann JR
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Aug; 84(8):2269-75. PubMed ID: 16864889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for value-added chicken product attributes.
    Martínez Michel L; Anders S; Wismer WV
    J Food Sci; 2011 Oct; 76(8):S469-77. PubMed ID: 22417604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The happy hen on your supermarket shelf: what choice does industrial strength free-range represent for consumers?
    Parker C; Brunswick C; Kotey J
    J Bioeth Inq; 2013 Jun; 10(2):165-86. PubMed ID: 23690245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.
    Hobin E; Bollinger B; Sacco J; Liebman E; Vanderlee L; Zuo F; Rosella L; L'abbe M; Manson H; Hammond D
    Milbank Q; 2017 Sep; 95(3):494-534. PubMed ID: 28895220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The price of good welfare: Does informing consumers about what on-package labels mean for animal welfare influence their purchase intentions?
    Cornish AR; Briley D; Wilson BJ; Raubenheimer D; Schlosberg D; McGreevy PD
    Appetite; 2020 May; 148():104577. PubMed ID: 31904389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Willingness to pay and moral stance: The case of farm animal welfare in Germany.
    Frey UJ; Pirscher F
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202193. PubMed ID: 30106999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Decoy Effect on Consumers' Purchase Behaviors in Relation to Meat Products: Comparison of Pork and Chicken.
    Xu L; Yu M; Chen X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():679256. PubMed ID: 34484036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Taiwanese Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Broiler Welfare Improvement.
    Yang YC; Hong CY
    Animals (Basel); 2019 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 31083431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Compromise Effect in Food Consumer Choices in China: An Analysis on Pork Products.
    Wu L; Gong X; Chen X; Hu W
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1352. PubMed ID: 32695046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Eliciting Egg Consumer Preferences for Organic Labels and Omega 3 Claims in Italy and Hungary.
    Yeh CH; Menozzi D; Török Á
    Foods; 2020 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 32882950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The influence of taste in willingness-to-pay valuations of sirloin steaks from postextraction algal residue-fed cattle.
    Johnson MD; Miller RK; Morrill JC; Anderson DP; Wickersham TA; Sawyer JE; Richardson JW; Palma MA
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):3072-83. PubMed ID: 27482694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The credibility of the effects of functional food products and consumers' willingness to purchase/willingness to pay- review.
    Plasek B; Temesi Á
    Appetite; 2019 Dec; 143():104398. PubMed ID: 31401236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Salted and preserved duck eggs: a consumer market segmentation analysis.
    Arthur J; Wiseman K; Cheng KM
    Poult Sci; 2015 Aug; 94(8):1942-56. PubMed ID: 26089479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Seasonality effects on consumers' preferences over quality attributes of different beef products.
    Ardeshiri A; Sampson S; Swait J
    Meat Sci; 2019 Nov; 157():107868. PubMed ID: 31234027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Assessing Consumer Preferences for Suboptimal Food: Application of a Choice Experiment in Citrus Fruit Retail.
    Huang WS; Kuo HY; Tung SY; Chen HS
    Foods; 2020 Dec; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 33374572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Consumer Attitudes and Preference Exploration towards Fresh-Cut Salads Using Best-Worst Scaling and Latent Class Analysis.
    Massaglia S; Merlino VM; Borra D; Bargetto A; Sottile F; Peano C
    Foods; 2019 Nov; 8(11):. PubMed ID: 31766119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Healthiness of Food and Beverages on Price Promotion at Promotional Displays: A Cross-Sectional Audit of Australian Supermarkets.
    Grigsby-Duffy L; Schultz S; Orellana L; Robinson E; Cameron AJ; Marshall J; Backholer K; Sacks G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 17(23):. PubMed ID: 33287395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Egg marketing in national supermarkets: specialty eggs--part 2.
    Patterson PH; Koelkebeck KW; Bell DD; Carey JB; Anderson KE; Darre MJ
    Poult Sci; 2001 Apr; 80(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 11297274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.