These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34948860)

  • 1. Fitting Assistive Technology for People with Hearing Loss: The Importance of Remote Microphone Systems' Electroacoustic Verification.
    Jacob RTS; Paccola ECM; Bucuvic ÉC; Salgado MH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Dec; 18(24):. PubMed ID: 34948860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Verification Protocol for Signal Transparency Using the Cochlear Mini-Microphone 2+ and Digital Modulation Transmitter and Receiver with Cochlear Implants.
    Sousa R; Nair E; Wannagot S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 30461401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verification of EasyGain Settings in the Roger Remote Microphone System.
    Qi S; Thibodeau L
    Am J Audiol; 2023 Sep; 32(3):514-525. PubMed ID: 37473439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Verification of a Proposed Clinical Electroacoustic Test Protocol for Personal Digital Modulation Receivers Coupled to Cochlear Implant Sound Processors.
    Nair EL; Sousa R; Wannagot S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(7):625-635. PubMed ID: 28722645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Battles J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency Modulation System and Bone Conduction Hearing Aid: Electroacoustic Verification.
    Paccola ECM; Costa Filho OA; Jacob RTS
    Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 25(4):e483-e489. PubMed ID: 34737817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parents' experiences of remote microphone systems for children with hearing loss.
    Gabova K; Meier Z; Tavel P
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; 19(3):831-840. PubMed ID: 36198072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A proposed electroacoustic test protocol for personal FM receivers coupled to cochlear implant sound processors.
    Schafer EC; Musgrave E; Momin S; Sandrock C; Romine D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):941-54. PubMed ID: 24384080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fitting Frequency-Lowering Signal Processing Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Updates and Protocols.
    Scollie S; Glista D; Seto J; Dunn A; Schuett B; Hawkins M; Pourmand N; Parsa V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):219-236. PubMed ID: 26967363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effects of FM and Hearing Aid Microphone Settings, FM Gain, and Ambient Noise Levels on SNR at the Tympanic Membrane.
    Norrix LW; Camarota K; Harris FP; Dean J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 26905531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electroacoustic assessment of wireless remote microphone systems.
    Salehi H; Parsa V; Folkeard P
    Audiol Res; 2018 Mar; 8(1):204. PubMed ID: 29732045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
    Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Performance With an Adaptive Digital Remote Microphone System and a Digital Remote Microphone Audio-Streaming Accessory System.
    Wolfe J; Duke MM; Schafer E; Jones C; Mülder HE; John A; Hudson M
    Am J Audiol; 2015 Sep; 24(3):440-50. PubMed ID: 26649548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electroacoustic evaluation of frequency-modulated receivers interfaced with personal hearing aids.
    Schafer EC; Thibodeau LM; Whalen HS; Overson GJ
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2007 Oct; 38(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 17890512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech understanding in noise with the Roger Pen, Naida CI Q70 processor, and integrated Roger 17 receiver in a multi-talker network.
    De Ceulaer G; Bestel J; Mülder HE; Goldbeck F; de Varebeke SP; Govaerts PJ
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 May; 273(5):1107-14. PubMed ID: 25983309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Benefit of Remote Microphones Using Four Wireless Protocols.
    Rodemerk KS; Galster JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):724-731. PubMed ID: 26333880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benefits in Speech Recognition in Noise with Remote Wireless Microphones in Group Settings.
    Thibodeau LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):404-411. PubMed ID: 31758679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experiments with classroom FM amplification.
    Boothroyd A; Iglehart F
    Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):202-17. PubMed ID: 9657595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual Differences Offer Insight Into Clinical Recommendations for Directional and Remote Microphone Technology Use in Children.
    Gustafson SJ; Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 64(2):635-650. PubMed ID: 33465321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.