These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34948860)

  • 21. Evaluation of an in-situ output probe-microphone method for hearing aid fitting verification.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1990 Feb; 11(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 2307301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Characteristics of hearing aid fittings in infants and young children.
    McCreery RW; Bentler RA; Roush PA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):701-10. PubMed ID: 23575463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Considerations for Choosing Microphone Technologies for Students With Limited Useable Hearing Unilaterally.
    Picou EM; Davis H; Tharpe AM
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2020 Jan; 51(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 31913805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Parents' experiences of remote microphone systems for children with hearing loss.
    Gabova K; Meier Z; Tavel P
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; 19(3):831-840. PubMed ID: 36198072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Adherence to Remote Microphone System use at school in children and adolescents with hearing loss.
    Esturaro GT; Youssef BC; Ficker LB; Deperon TM; Mendes BCA; Novaes BCAC
    Codas; 2022; 34(3):e20200326. PubMed ID: 35043858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of Wireless Remote Microphone on Speech Recognition in Noise for Hearing Aid Users in China.
    Chen J; Wang Z; Dong R; Fu X; Wang Y; Wang S
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():643205. PubMed ID: 33912004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance characteristics for hearing aid microphone versus telephone and telephone/telecoil reception modes.
    Tannahill JC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Jun; 26(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 6887805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Listening Effort in School-Aged Children With Limited Useable Hearing Unilaterally: Examining the Effects of a Personal, Digital Remote Microphone System and a Contralateral Routing of Signal System.
    Oosthuizen I; Picou EM; Pottas L; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216520984700. PubMed ID: 33602042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Test-retest reliability of probe-microphone verification in children fitted with open and closed hearing aid tips.
    Kim H; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):635-42. PubMed ID: 24047950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Remote Microphone System Use at Home: Impact on Child-Directed Speech.
    Benítez-Barrera CR; Thompson EC; Angley GP; Woynaroski T; Tharpe AM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 62(6):2002-2008. PubMed ID: 31112670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Effects of Manufacturer's Prefit and Real-Ear Fitting on the Predicted Speech Perception of Children with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss.
    Quar TK; Umat C; Chew YY
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):346-356. PubMed ID: 30461383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of a BICROS System with a Directional Microphone in the Receiver and Transmitter.
    Valente M; Oeding K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):856-71. PubMed ID: 26554490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of Hearing Aid Directionality and Remote Microphone on Speech Intelligibility in Complex Listening Situations.
    Wagener KC; Vormann M; Latzel M; Mülder HE
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804945. PubMed ID: 30322342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus
    Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fitting Noise Management Signal Processing Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Verification Protocols.
    Scollie S; Levy C; Pourmand N; Abbasalipour P; Bagatto M; Richert F; Moodie S; Crukley J; Parsa V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):237-251. PubMed ID: 26967364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electromagnetic versus electrical coupling of personal frequency modulation (FM) receivers to cochlear implant sound processors.
    Schafer EC; Romine D; Musgrave E; Momin S; Huynh C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):927-40. PubMed ID: 24384079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recognition performance for four combinations of FM system and hearing aid microphone signals in adverse listening conditions.
    Pittman AL; Lewis DE; Hoover BM; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10466564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.