These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34949068)

  • 1. DISTANCE METHODS: A REPLY TO FARRIS.
    Felsenstein J
    Cladistics; 1986 Mar; 2(2):130-143. PubMed ID: 34949068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parameters of the menstrual cycle: A reply.
    Potter RG
    Popul Stud (Camb); 1966 Nov; 20(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 22084911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
    Saitou N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Jul; 4(4):406-25. PubMed ID: 3447015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DISTANCES AND STATISTICS.
    Farris JS
    Cladistics; 1986 Mar; 2(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 34949067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species.
    Tateno Y; Nei M; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 1982; 18(6):387-404. PubMed ID: 7175956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weighted least-squares likelihood ratio test for branch testing in phylogenies reconstructed from distance measures.
    Sanjuán R; Wróbel B
    Syst Biol; 2005 Apr; 54(2):218-29. PubMed ID: 16012093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A weighted least-squares approach for inferring phylogenies from incomplete distance matrices.
    Makarenkov V; Lapointe FJ
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 20(13):2113-21. PubMed ID: 15059836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Construction of phylogenetic trees for proteins and nucleic acids: empirical evaluation of alternative matrix methods.
    Prager EM; Wilson AC
    J Mol Evol; 1978 Jun; 11(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 671561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An alternating least squares approach to inferring phylogenies from pairwise distances.
    Felsenstein J
    Syst Biol; 1997 Mar; 46(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 11975348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The ancestral distance test: what relatedness can reveal about correlated evolution in large lineages with missing character data and incomplete phylogenies.
    Hearn D; Huber M
    Syst Biol; 2006 Oct; 55(5):803-17. PubMed ID: 17060201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Euclidean nature of phylogenetic distance matrices.
    de Vienne DM; Aguileta G; Ollier S
    Syst Biol; 2011 Dec; 60(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 21804094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sequence alignment, mutual information, and dissimilarity measures for constructing phylogenies.
    Penner O; Grassberger P; Paczuski M
    PLoS One; 2011 Jan; 6(1):e14373. PubMed ID: 21245917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies.
    Bandelt HJ; Forster P; Röhl A
    Mol Biol Evol; 1999 Jan; 16(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 10331250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The performance of the Congruence Among Distance Matrices (CADM) test in phylogenetic analysis.
    Campbell V; Legendre P; Lapointe FJ
    BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Mar; 11():64. PubMed ID: 21388552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Theoretical foundation of the balanced minimum evolution method of phylogenetic inference and its relationship to weighted least-squares tree fitting.
    Desper R; Gascuel O
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Mar; 21(3):587-98. PubMed ID: 14694080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The consistency of several phylogeny-inference methods under varying evolutionary rates.
    DeBry RW
    Mol Biol Evol; 1992 May; 9(3):537-51. PubMed ID: 1584019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simple method for constructing phylogenetic trees from distance matrices.
    Li WH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1981 Feb; 78(2):1085-9. PubMed ID: 6940127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computing diversity from dated phylogenies and taxonomic hierarchies: does it make a difference to the conclusions?
    Ricotta C; Bacaro G; Marignani M; Godefroid S; Mazzoleni S
    Oecologia; 2012 Oct; 170(2):501-6. PubMed ID: 22526936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.